• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Come on Wales!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by Ruprect View Post
    Glad the all blacks made it through. They're playing peerless rugby. Just hope they finish the job now.
    The Holy All Blacks? Not me.

    Comment


      #62
      Having seen the highlights of the game on Sunday I seem to be disagreeing with all the TV pundits.
      It was a bad tackle and deserved a red card.
      Like others have said, it was the kickers that really let the side down. 3 pens, 2 drops and a conversion and 14 Welsh could have stuffed the French.
      New Zealand looked in terrific form against Aus. Unless the French turn up for their 1 outstanding game then the trophy is NZs.
      Just saying like.

      where there's chaos, there's cash !

      I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong!

      Lowering the tone since 1963

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by Arturo Bassick View Post
        Having seen the highlights of the game on Sunday I seem to be disagreeing with all the TV pundits.
        It was a bad tackle and deserved a red card.
        Like others have said, it was the kickers that really let the side down. 3 pens, 2 drops and a conversion and 14 Welsh could have stuffed the French.
        New Zealand looked in terrific form against Aus. Unless the French turn up for their 1 outstanding game then the trophy is NZs.
        Not all of them; Matt Dawson was there, saw it first hand and said the ref was right. He's a world cup winner, not your average run of the mill pundit.
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by Arturo Bassick View Post
          Having seen the highlights of the game on Sunday I seem to be disagreeing with all the TV pundits.
          It was a bad tackle and deserved a red card.
          Like others have said, it was the kickers that really let the side down. 3 pens, 2 drops and a conversion and 14 Welsh could have stuffed the French.
          New Zealand looked in terrific form against Aus. Unless the French turn up for their 1 outstanding game then the trophy is NZs.
          NZ were brutally efficient; nothing amazing, just good solid team play without errors. Did you ever see a NZ player isolated without support? Was there ever a moment that an NZ player committed himself to the ruck unnecessarily? Did they make any over the top tackles? No; every player had support on his shoulder every time he had the ball, the field was covered all the time and every time one player made a sensible tackle (just stop the guy is enough), another one was there to rip the ball.

          Textbook rugby really, well deserved victory.
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
            NZ were brutally efficient; nothing amazing, just good solid team play without errors. Did you ever see a NZ player isolated without support? Was there ever a moment that an NZ player committed himself to the ruck unnecessarily? Did they make any over the top tackles? No; every player had support on his shoulder every time he had the ball, the field was covered all the time and every time one player made a sensible tackle (just stop the guy is enough), another one was there to rip the ball.

            Textbook rugby really, well deserved victory.
            Reminded me of England 2003
            Just saying like.

            where there's chaos, there's cash !

            I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong!

            Lowering the tone since 1963

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by Arturo Bassick View Post
              Reminded me of England 2003
              Indeed; perhaps we can hope they'll be just as ineffective afterwards!
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                Not all of them; Matt Dawson was there, saw it first hand and said the ref was right. He's a world cup winner, not your average run of the mill pundit.
                Pienaar and Dalaglio on ITV are also world cup winners and they couldn't stop saying how wrong the decision was.

                But I concede Dalaglio isn't that bright and Pienaar comes from a country where they think anything should be allowed.

                Comment


                  #68
                  Anyway, for what it's worth I'm collecting some drinkies from the Dutch national captain tomorrow evening who bet me a bottle of wine that Aus and Wales would win at the weekend. I've told him to do the world a favour and predict that France win the final.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X