$1740.05
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Gold
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Under 1000 by christmas.Originally posted by Churchill View Post$1740.05And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Unless of course someone like S&P, Moodys or Fitch can manufacture some bad news to rescue the gold speculators.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
I pity the poor bastards who bought at $1900 a couple of days ago.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostUnless of course someone like S&P, Moodys or Fitch can manufacture some bad news to rescue the gold speculators.
Actually, I don't.Comment
-
-
That must be stolen Lybian gold dumped on the market by CIA who masterminded this whole "revolution" solely to get their hands on the gold.
Alf
Comment
-
Are you sure it wasn't the stolen Libyan gold?Originally posted by AtW View PostThat must be stolen Lybian gold dumped on the market by CIA who masterminded this whole "revolution" solely to get their hands on the gold.
Alf

Comment
-
Funny how fighting a war for "democracy" in Libya became No.1 priority, what with them having lots of oil and gold, where as other less oily and less goldy countries didn't make the shortlist for US/UK "support".Originally posted by Churchill View PostAre you sure it wasn't the stolen Libyan gold?
Is Bliar still in charge?
Comment
-
Depends. If it goes back on 5 year trend it should be around 1500 by Christmass. If it heads back to the 10 year trend we're looking at 1300, on the 20 year trend it's below 1000.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostUnder 1000 by christmas.
I reckon it will be somewhere between 5 and 10."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Oh I see you're being clever about this; I was just taking a wild guess.Originally posted by DaveB View PostDepends. If it goes back on 5 year trend it should be around 1500 by Christmass. If it heads back to the 10 year trend we're looking at 1300, on the 20 year trend it's below 1000.
I reckon it will be somewhere between 5 and 10.
I'll bet you 1 +rep I'm right.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Comment