Originally posted by JamJarST
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Getting fit, when do you start to feel better?
Collapse
X
-
Low intensity exercise is better for losing weight than high intensity cardio. So walking is ideal. -
It doesn't really work that way; your body needs a rest from training for 5 to 7 days continually every 5 to 8 weeks, depending on age and basic fitness. Look at athletes; many of them beat their personal best just after they've had time out with an injury; the injury forced them to rest and let their bodies adapt.Originally posted by alreadypacked View PostI'm staying away from the 'killer' sessions, so it may take a bit longer.
Remember that even without the killer sessions, you're asking your body to adapt and 'supercompensate' every time you train; that takes a hell of a lot energy. Training si about the overload principle; you push yourself a little buit harder every time (or lift a slightly bigger weight, lift it more often, run a bit faster or a bit further etc) and your body adapts to the new level of performance, overcompensating slightly; it can't do that without rest. Talk to your personal trainer about the training load and tell him you feel you might have been overloading yourself too much. If he knows his trade he'll adapt the training to help, or advise you on your diet if that's a problem.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Actually exercise that puts you in the fat burning zone is better than high intensity cardio, but normal walking doesn't raise the heart rate enough.Originally posted by Sockpuppet View PostLow intensity exercise is better for losing weight than high intensity cardio. So walking is ideal.Comment
-
Depends how unfit you are and what you define as walking.Originally posted by JamJarST View PostActually exercise that puts you in the fat burning zone is better than high intensity cardio, but normal walking doesn't raise the heart rate enough.Comment
-
Yes that is true.Originally posted by Sockpuppet View PostDepends how unfit you are and what you define as walking.Comment
-
Not necessarily the case. If someone's a fat lump of blubber that hasn't moved from the couch in years, gentle walking would indeed be the right thing, especially seeing as he'd probably have a heart attack if it was any harder. However, if someone is fit or very fit and needs to shed some fat, then one long aerobic session and a couple of shorter sessions of interval training each week plus strength training will get more progess. I talked to some coaches who work with professional soccer players and who tell me that when the players get back from their summer break they've often developed a 'beer and chips pouch', and that the first few sessions of training will involve the kind of thing every sportsman hates; burpees, 300 metre sprints uphill and shuttle runs with very little rest. Their belly disappears very quickly because their heart then beats a little faster than normal and they take in a little more oxygen than normal all night when they go to bed after training; as I say, I wouldn't recommend that kind of thing for people who aren't fit to start with.Originally posted by Sockpuppet View PostLow intensity exercise is better for losing weight than high intensity cardio. So walking is ideal.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
I don't think women can expect to gain a significant amount of weight from building muscles. IIRC female body builders with more than their fair share of testosterone and training like banshees can't pack on more than a couple of pounds of muscle a year.Originally posted by cojak View PostYou can expect to put on weight as you build muscle.
Throw away the scales and start using the tape measure, your clothes will start to feel more comfortable/too big as you start to tone up.
As for feeling better, do you notice that you no longer sound like a wounded wart hog after climbing 3 flights of stairs at a gallop?
It's those little things you'll notice.Comment
-
At a brisk walk (3-4 mph) you'll burn 300-350 calories an hour, so it's actually a good way of loosing weight over time without the injury risks of jogging.Originally posted by JamJarST View PostActually exercise that puts you in the fat burning zone is better than high intensity cardio, but normal walking doesn't raise the heart rate enough."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
About a pound to 2 pounds a month is possible without steroids, but it involves spending a lot of time in the gym training to muscle failure and eating a lot.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostI don't think women can expect to gain a significant amount of weight from building muscles. IIRC female body builders with more than their fair share of testosterone and training like banshees can't pack on more than a couple of pounds of muscle a year.
But genetics plays a huge role; if you're geneticaly predisposed to building muscle mass than you'll get heavier more quickly than those who aren't.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Especially uphill, where being heavy works in your favour, in the sense of making it more work.Originally posted by Sockpuppet View PostLow intensity exercise is better for losing weight than high intensity cardio. So walking is ideal.
Even fit people don't break the laws of physics walking uphill, no matter how hard they train, mgh (mass , grvaity, height) is the minimum, and that can be multiplied by 4 or more depending on fitness.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Today 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Yesterday 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41

Comment