• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Households on 'money knife-edge'

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by threaded
    Well if you live there or work in it, then it is yours. If you don't then it is up for anyone who has need of it.

    Say you have a farm, if you work or live on the farm then it is yours, if you just own it and someone else works it, then that is theft. You are stealing the product of his efforts.
    what if you have a farm and you are doing rather well, so well in fact that you need more land.

    The farmer next door has been ill for a few weeks and therefore could not claim to be "working his land" - does this give you the right to now own his land on the basis that he hasnt worked it for a while ?

    Who decides what period of "not working it" counts as valid before the lands is up for grabs for anyone to use ?

    Lets say that this situation occurs several times per year in an area, causing much upset and argument every time it does so. The local wisemen (and women and those that havent yet decided) get together and agree that "non-worked land is land that hasnt been worked for 6 months or more"

    So they pass a COMMON LAW to that fact (or locally accepted agreement which amounts to the same thing)....and there we are back at square one with a system of COMMON LAW which in time will quickly expand to cover all manner things

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by eternalnomad
      The local wisemen (and women and those that havent yet decided) get together and agree that "non-worked land is land that hasnt been worked for 6 months or more"

      So they pass a COMMON LAW to that fact (or locally accepted agreement which amounts to the same thing)....and there we are back at square one with a system of COMMON LAW which in time will quickly expand to cover all manner things
      That's not Common Law, that is a gang with a common purpose.

      "Common Law" is an oxymoron anyway.

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by milanbenes
        and that was an economics broadcast by the failed contractor techie who moved into the permy world of management - nice one.

        Milan.
        Stay in .NOT or not? I hope your Plan B is good, you'll need it.
        Hard Brexit now!
        #prayfornodeal

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by Disgusted
          I'm disgusted.
          In which case you should be beheaded.

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by DimPrawn
            Que Spartacus
            You rang?
            I'm Spartacus.

            Comment


              #56
              I don't see that many people will have financial problems in the near future. That sort of thing happens when people over extend themselves, and an economic gremlin awakes. In the past it's been unemployment, sudden and rapid increases in interest rates, and a crash in a housing bubble. We currently have considerable stability through-out the world. This is not due to Flash Gordon, though BofE independence helps, but it's a world phenomenon. We seem to be less dependent on oil prices, and globalisation seems to stabilise things.

              Many economists think that people are not borrowing unduly large amounts.

              Now if the gov. restricted immigration to sensible levels, then we would have less unemployment, but we would also see the housing bubble burst as it is currently being sustained only by a shortage of housing.

              I say restrict immigration and let the over-extended gets suffer, have their houses re-possessed, house prices tumble, than I can buy a house cheap. Suits me nicely.

              Comment


                #57
                You don't need to be an economist to know that debt is bad.

                You need adequate brains though.

                Comment


                  #58
                  Originally posted by stackpole
                  You don't need to be an economist to know that debt is bad.

                  You need adequate brains though.
                  Well actually debt has driven the consumer boom of the last 10 years or so in the UK and the US. It has helped drive the economy. Excessive debt is bad, as seen in Japan for the last decade or so.

                  Comment


                    #59
                    Originally posted by stackpole
                    You don't need to be an economist to know that debt is bad.

                    You need adequate brains though.
                    It isn't bad if you can put the money to good use and end up with more when the debt is repaid than you would have made with only your money.
                    Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

                    Comment


                      #60
                      Originally posted by Fungus
                      Well actually debt has driven the consumer boom of the last 10 years or so in the UK and the US. It has helped drive the economy. Excessive debt is bad, as seen in Japan for the last decade or so.
                      If you drive a consumer boom with increasing debt, it can only have one ending.

                      (edit) I should have added: the longer the boom, the worse the ending
                      Last edited by stackpole; 29 March 2006, 12:07.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X