A week today and I've got my first essay type exam for 28 years, so I've been practising my handwriting and boy do my wrists ache.
Also whilst revising came across a bit of Cicero that has some startling revelancies for todays society.
(a)
Gaius Gracchus introduced a corn law. The commons were delighted, it made generous provision for the means of subsistence without their having to work for it. The boni found it repugnant, because they thought the commons were being encouraged to give up hard work and take to idleness, and they could see that the treasury was being drained dry. (Cicero, Pro Sestio 103)
(b)
... so too Gaius Gracchus. Although he had granted extravagant doles and poured out money from the treasury like water, he nevertheless spoke as if he were the watch-dog of the treasury. Why should I pay attention to words when the facts are in front of my eyes? The famous Lucius Piso Frugi had consistently opposed the corn law. But once the law had been ratified, for all that he was an ex-consul, he came along to collect his corn ration. Gracchus noticed Piso standing there in the crowd, and with the Roman people listening asked him how he could reconcile his applying for his corn ration with his opposition to the law which made it possible. ‘Idonot care for
this fancy of yours, Gracchus, to divide my goods among every
Tom, Dick and Harry’, replied Piso; ‘but, since that is what you
are doing, I shall claim my share.’ Does not the conduct of that
worthy and wise statesman make it plain that Rome’s public
wealth was being squandered by Gracchus’ law? Yet read
Gracchus’ speeches and you will declare him to be the jealous
guardian of the public purse.
(Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 3.48)
Also whilst revising came across a bit of Cicero that has some startling revelancies for todays society.
(a)
Gaius Gracchus introduced a corn law. The commons were delighted, it made generous provision for the means of subsistence without their having to work for it. The boni found it repugnant, because they thought the commons were being encouraged to give up hard work and take to idleness, and they could see that the treasury was being drained dry. (Cicero, Pro Sestio 103)
(b)
... so too Gaius Gracchus. Although he had granted extravagant doles and poured out money from the treasury like water, he nevertheless spoke as if he were the watch-dog of the treasury. Why should I pay attention to words when the facts are in front of my eyes? The famous Lucius Piso Frugi had consistently opposed the corn law. But once the law had been ratified, for all that he was an ex-consul, he came along to collect his corn ration. Gracchus noticed Piso standing there in the crowd, and with the Roman people listening asked him how he could reconcile his applying for his corn ration with his opposition to the law which made it possible. ‘Idonot care for
this fancy of yours, Gracchus, to divide my goods among every
Tom, Dick and Harry’, replied Piso; ‘but, since that is what you
are doing, I shall claim my share.’ Does not the conduct of that
worthy and wise statesman make it plain that Rome’s public
wealth was being squandered by Gracchus’ law? Yet read
Gracchus’ speeches and you will declare him to be the jealous
guardian of the public purse.
(Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 3.48)
Comment