Originally posted by cswd
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
.NET - In the Navy!
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by AtWMy work can be generally characterised as "fit for purpose". Thus if I worked on a nuclear missile I'd focus on (in this order of priority):
a) ensuring that it can only be launched by 200% authorised people
b) not blowing it up in the wrong place (ie during launch thus killing sub and potentially contaminating open water)
c) accurately reaching target - with some hard safeguards to prevent launching at targets that can't be possibly valid (ie London)
How fast the missile will run is out of programmers hands - its the job for missile engineers and it will be pretty much fixed constant.
I will now write out 1000 times: "I must be more literal and not make any attempt at humour no matter how tenuous". Then I will beat myself with Birch twigs, and run a half marathon stark bollock naked.
As an aside, I worked for a year on contract to IBM. What worried me is that the military work was seen as the place to send the duffers: those not bright enough to do the more interesting work.Comment
-
Originally posted by FungusWhat worried me is that the military work was seen as the place to send the duffers: those not bright enough to do the more interesting work.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtWMilitary is very much "do by the book" kind of thing, so its not suprising the jobs there are boring and creative people want to do something else - something where fault tolerance is much more relaxed.Comment
-
Originally posted by FungusBut those relegated to military were the ones with poor work, lots of bugs etc.Comment
-
If all the missile guidance systems are going to be in .Net, does that mean we'll have missiles falling out of the sky?
>Location Portsmouth, Hampshire
tulip, I'm working near there.His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...Comment
-
I thought them missiles with the cameras in them to see where they're going run FORTH (on them special purpose micros built for the job).Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtWBug count depends on a resolution of an eye - look at water from tap and you won't see a thing, but use good microscope and you will see lots of bugs there.Comment
-
.NET is everywhere.
Even humble household appliances are now running .NET
For example, I have a large lump hammer that is running .NET V2.0
Works a treat.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Five tax return mistakes contractors will make any day now… Jan 9 09:27
- Experts you can trust to deliver UK and global solutions tailored to your needs! Jan 8 15:10
- Business & Personal Protection for Contractors Jan 8 13:58
- ‘Four interest rate cuts in 2025’ not echoed by contractor advisers Jan 8 08:24
- ‘Why Should We Hire You?’ How to answer as an IT contractor Jan 7 09:30
- Even IT contractors connect with 'New Year, New Job.' But… Jan 6 09:28
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
Comment