Originally posted by Churchill
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Errrrr, Dad, I had a bit of an accident with the car....
Collapse
X
-
-
That's just what the kids father said.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostCOAT! ---->
NOW!Comment
-
Are you inferring that a "normal" car subjected to the same treatment as the aforementioned "supercar" would have faired any better?Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostSuch as?
"Supercars" have even more effective brakes than "normal" cars. How many have you driven?Comment
-
You obviously missed the pun in my post.Originally posted by Churchill View PostAre you inferring that a "normal" car subjected to the same treatment as the aforementioned "supercar" would have faired any better?
"Supercars" have even more effective brakes than "normal" cars. How many have you driven?Comment
-
Funny, it came across as though you didn't have a ******* clue.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostYou obviously missed the pun in my post.
Comment
-
What is it with you Chruchill someone makes a bit of a joke - and you decide to start hurling abuse.
Sort it out muppet
Comment
-
It's CUK in here, you're not supposed to have a ******* clue!Originally posted by Churchill View PostFunny, it came across as though you didn't have a ******* clue.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Ok, I apologise.Originally posted by original PM View PostWhat is it with you Chruchill someone makes a bit of a joke - and you decide to start hurling abuse.
Sort it out muppet

TimberWolf, I'm sorry.Comment
-
Well, as long as you are feeling better now that's the main thingOriginally posted by Churchill View PostOk, I apologise.
TimberWolf, I'm sorry.
Comment
-
eeeeew I really did not want to think about that over lunch!Originally posted by zeitghostAre you suggesting that
has got his hand up Churchill's arse?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Today 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36
- The JSL legislation we’ll surely get just dropped. Here’s 4 ‘indelibles’ Dec 10 07:26

Comment