Originally posted by MarillionFan
View Post
In the case my friend was discussing, the Mail reporter was clearly disappointed to learn that the murder victim lived in social housing, but was willing to continue the call; it was the words "mixed race" that caused them to ring off. In other words, had the victim had blonde hair and blue eyes, there would still have been a story in it for them, albeit a lesser one, given that the value of the family's home could not be dragged in to the narrative.
In a similar way, it was noted by many media observers that the disappearance of Shannon Matthews did not receive the same degree of enthusiastic coverage from the national press as did the case of Madeline McCann, and it was pretty obvious that this was due to class. Had Shannon Matthews been of mixed race, there's a good chance the nationals (or at least tabloid rags like the Mail) wouldn't have run with the story at all, despite the huge search operation by the West Yorks police.
That story only really became interesting to them once the child was found and the bizarre circumstance of having been kidnapped by her own mother came to light, at which point they could use the family's social class against them in a way that pandered to their readerships' concept (carefully nurtured by such papers) of a "feral underclass" exploiting the system. At that point, they would have loved it if the family had also happened to be black or of mixed race, as they could also have pandered to similar prejudices about immigrants.


Comment