Junkie defends himself online

[suityou01]

Very

Schmoke and a pancake?

[RichardCranium]

In reference to the anonymous -ve rep I have just received:

Thread: Junkie defends himself...
Wow! What an idiot or troll?

Please, simply explain to me why someone who has got himself a criminal record growing illegal drugs to service his drug use is not a junkie.

I'm not the idiot here - it is the twat in court that is the idiot. Nor am I the troll, it was the twat that was in court that has a criminal record that objected to the local paper reporting the fact that he is drug-addicted criminal.

[suityou01]

In reference to the anonymous -ve rep I have just received:



Please, simply explain to me why someone who has got himself a criminal record growing illegal drugs to service his drug use is not a junkie.

I'm not the idiot here - it is the twat in court that is the idiot. Nor am I the troll, it was the twat that was in court that has a criminal record that objected to the local paper reporting the fact that he is drug-addicted criminal.

Have you been at the "Droopy" again dude?

[suityou01]

In reference to the anonymous -ve rep I have just received:



Please, simply explain to me why someone who has got himself a criminal record growing illegal drugs to service his drug use is not a junkie.

I'm not the idiot here - it is the twat in court that is the idiot. Nor am I the troll, it was the twat that was in court that has a criminal record that objected to the local paper reporting the fact that he is drug-addicted criminal.

Really, how unfair

I got loads of +ve for my posts

[RichardCranium]

Have you been at the "Droopy" again dude?

Not yet. But clearly I might need to.

[RichardCranium]

Really, how unfair

I got loads of +ve for my posts

That'll be MF's love letters.

[suityou01]

In reference to the anonymous -ve rep I have just received:



Please, simply explain to me why someone who has got himself a criminal record growing illegal drugs to service his drug use is not a junkie.

I'm not the idiot here - it is the twat in court that is the idiot. Nor am I the troll, it was the twat that was in court that has a criminal record that objected to the local paper reporting the fact that he is drug-addicted criminal.

OK ok I'll bite.

This lad is just an idiot. Probably some weird kind of dope snobbery going on that the stuff from the dealers is crap so I'll grow me own hard core tulipe...

Brags about it in the pub, someone overhears, thinks what a knob, pulls a few strings, outs him in the local rag and he gets his just desserts.

Let me guess, part of his court order is to take whatever the skunk equivalent of methadone is to ween him off. Don't think so.

Not an addict, more of a bell end IYAM.

[minestrone]

You've still not convinced me.

He is so driven by his need for a drug that he has got himself a criminal record.

That kind of need is an addiction He is a drug addict. A junkie is a drug addict.

If you choose, for political reasons, to exclude some of the drugs from the definitions according to your own personal values, that does not change the facts nor the law.

He is a criminal because of his need for his drugs. What's that if not a junkie?

Part of the trolling wind up (take it from me) is to make you story believable.

[suityou01]

Part of the trolling wind up (take it from me) is to make you story believable.

Yer but he's learning

[RichardCranium]

Yer but he's learning

Oh, stupid me.

Of course, Soupy is winding me up. And I fell for it.



Well done. <insert slow handclap smiley>