Should the identity of reppers be revealed?

[sasguru]

Vote now

[ThomasSoerensen]

where?

[PRC1964]

Just scrap the rep feature and be done with it. Surely you're all grown up enough not to care about a playground popularity contest?

[MarillionFan]

No.

Either have it anonymous or don't have it all.

I receive a huge amount of rep both positive and negative and the same people calling for an outing of reppers are the same ones leaving negatives anonymously.

Which in turn is all of you!

So either have it anonymous or don't have it all. And that also goes for tag cloud.

[RichardCranium]

Enabling it retrospectively would be unfair, but I can see how doing so would appeal to admin's cruel sense of humour.

[Zippy]

I agree with MF.
If people are using reps to wage some personal vendetta then Admin can investigate.

[cailin maith]

No.

Either have it anonymous or don't have it all.

I receive a huge amount of rep both positive and negative and the same people calling for an outing of reppers are the same ones leaving negatives anonymously.

Which in turn is all of you!

So either have it anonymous or don't have it all. And that also goes for tag cloud.

Oh arse

I actually agree with you.

[ThomasSoerensen]

Enabling it retrospectively would be unfair, but I can see how doing so would appeal to admin's cruel sense of humour.

you do it for the surprise factor.

OUTED!!!!!!!!

[minestrone]

I have only given one negative rep (doogie) and that was just to see how it worked. I'm quite happy to abuse people out in the open on this forum.

I gave up abusing the tag cloud as it took too much effort and it always got cleaned up the next day.

[MarillionFan]

I have only given one negative rep (doogie) and that was just to see how it worked. I'm quite happy to abuse people out in the open on this forum.

I gave up abusing the tag cloud as it took too much effort and it always got cleaned up the next day.

You're bloody stingy with the +ve rep as well.

Typical Scotsman.