Originally posted by SueEllen
View Post
The problem is not that the Heathrow shops are high street chains, it is that they have decided how they want to run for their convenience, and nobody has told them otherwise. BAA could have imposed such a rule as a condition for getting a franchise, but passenger needs are not BAA's concern. The government could have imposed such a consideration on the airport operator, but has apparently decided that business works best if you get out of its way. This is true if you define "works best" as making profits for shareholders, and nothing else. It is not true if you also include in the definition of "works" the requiement to serve users' needs appropriately.
In general, I blame BAA and the government. The government for not properly regulating how an airport is run, and BAA for running it for their shareholders, and for their customers; and for seeing their customers as airlines and shops, not passengers - passengers are not customers, they are just revenue streams.
It is a classic case where private enterprise can achieve the best results, but only if it is gently guided to a consensus view of what would be the best results.
Comment