• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

What happened to Kandr?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by freelancer75 View Post
    You need help, I have complained. What a freak.


    Thanks for the "Dear Administrator, please review the posts I have made today" rep!
    My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
      It is looking like you may blow out here RC. I'd imagine the second you flounce a whole new bunch of 'RC sockies' will appear. Remember. You did promise Admin not to do anymore though.
      So Richard has been found out by the Admins to have created sockies in the past? Yet he heaps so much abuse on me, without any proof? That is seriously hypocritical.

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by Clippy View Post

        Which part of fu_ck off do you not get?
        He gets it to start with, but then the underscore throws him.
        Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
          It is looking like you may blow out here RC. I'd imagine the second you flounce a whole new bunch of 'RC sockies' will appear. Remember. You did promise Admin not to do anymore though.
          WTF are you on about?

          Edit: Hang on - are you accusing me of being kandr et al? Bog off!
          My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by freelancer75 View Post

            So Richard has been found out by the Admins to have created sockies in the past? Yet he heaps so much abuse on me, without any proof? That is seriously hypocritical.
            Oh God, not another markmm/kandr/AndyW incarnation.

            It's like zombies in some horror film - No sooner have you whacked one on the head with a shovel than another lurches into view.
            Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by freelancer75 View Post
              Surely this kind of abuse is not allowed, is this how all newbies are treated? How do I complain about this?
              Read the FFAQ?
              Last edited by Moscow Mule; 9 December 2010, 22:59.
              ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
                IIRC admin reduced it to something like three or four posts, mainly because the usual suspects were whining about having to actually put some effort into activating their sockpuppets.
                I personally found it was outrageous that my backup account had to be approved making first post ... this is not inclusive at all!

                D1mPrawn

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by RichardCranium View Post
                  WTF are you on about?

                  Edit: Hang on - are you accusing me of being kandr et al? Bog off!
                  If the Chrimbo hat fits.

                  At the end of the day, you've been on all day and when Kandr is posting. You aint!

                  Members of the jury. I put it to you that RichardCranium has not heeded the advice of the board Administration and continues to find it amusing to create 'sockies' to insult other posters. I put it to you that RichardCranium revels in his notorious reputation as a 'causer of trouble', 'a rabble rouser', 'a sockpupper master'. I offer no reason for this, no logical reason that you or I would see as a reason to 'bring to it's knees' a wonderful institution such as CUK. Perhaps, one day he will share that reason, but the proof is damning. I put it to you, the jury that RichardCranium is an 'agent provacateur', 'an internet terrorist', 'a recruitment agent in disguise'.

                  There is only one recourse that can be agreed upon. Only one decision you can reach. Guilty! Guilty as charged!

                  Hanging is too good...
                  What happens in General, stays in General.
                  You know what they say about assumptions!

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
                    If the Chrimbo hat fits.

                    At the end of the day, you've been on all day and when Kandr is posting. You aint!

                    Members of the jury. I put it to you that RichardCranium has not heeded the advice of the board Administration and continues to find it amusing to create 'sockies' to insult other posters. I put it to you that RichardCranium revels in his notorious reputation as a 'causer of trouble', 'a rabble rouser', 'a sockpupper master'. I offer no reason for this, no logical reason that you or I would see as a reason to 'bring to it's knees' a wonderful institution such as CUK. Perhaps, one day he will share that reason, but the proof is damning. I put it to you, the jury that RichardCranium is an 'agent provacateur', 'an internet terrorist', 'a recruitment agent in disguise'.

                    There is only one recourse that can be agreed upon. Only one decision you can reach. Guilty! Guilty as charged!

                    Hanging is too good...
                    Ha ha bloody ha.

                    I'm inclined to agree with SuitYou01 that whoever is doing it would be unwelcome at any RLM I was at.

                    Mind you, I like the 'Internet terrorist' bit.
                    My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
                      For the record all of these sockies are nothing to do with me.

                      I notice that you Nick have been rather quiet on the subject, which by a process known as tabloid journalism makes you the sockie master!
                      It would rather make sense for Nick to have a sockie or to, as an outlet for being so damn reasonable all the time
                      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                      Originally posted by vetran
                      Urine is quite nourishing

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X