Is there anything more weak-minded and meaningless than having "faith"?

[kandr]

Religious people give religion a bad name? Slightly circular logic there.What is it I'm supposed to be arguing for? I haven't seen you make any arguments, only blanket statements. Seeing as you are the one sending out insults, I agree. If you read my posts you'll see I continue to use reason and post links supporting what I say... in contrast you you making stuff up.

Right on cue, proves my point. I'm fed up of this, can't argue with irrational, delusional people like yourself.

[doodab]

I think you'll find my arguments match Dawkins, Hitchens etc.

Oh dear.

The only thing you have succeeded in arguing for so far is the death of taste and decency. You have all the charm of a dead ewe's carrion minge, but none of the intellect, and your verbiage is peppered with spelling and grammatical errors that make the average cuk post look like a collaboration between Einstein and Dorothy Parker.

I am an atheist BTW.

[d000hg]

Right on cue, proves my point. I'm fed up of this, can't argue with irrational, delusional people like yourself.

Good decision. Flounce off claiming you're the one not being listened to. Trying to save face but nobody's fooled.

You make atheism look bad.

[kandr]

Oh dear.

The only thing you have succeeded in arguing for so far is the death of taste and decency. You have all the charm of a dead ewe's carrion minge, but none of the intellect, and your verbiage is peppered with spelling and grammatical errors that make the average cuk post look like a collaboration between Einstein and Dorothy Parker.

I am an atheist BTW.

None of the intellect of a dead ewe's carrion minge? How much is that exactly, let me guess the same level as yours? . Too easy

[doodab]

None of the intellect of a dead ewe's carrion minge? How much is that exactly, let me guess the same level as yours? . Too easy

Too easy? Perhaps you should try harder and come up with something that is actually worth writing.

Although I can see that in your own way, you're building a powerful case against the pro-life brigade

[kandr]

Too easy? Perhaps you should try harder and come up with something that is actually worth writing.

Although I can see that in your own way, you're building a powerful case against the pro-life brigade

Stealing other peoples insults now? Can you become a Christian or Muslim seems to suit your level of intellect more.

[contractor79]

I am an atheist BTW.

Do you know how sad that makes other feel? It's no badge of honour. It's like declaring you have a self-inflicted critical illness.

[MarillionFan]

Do you know how sad that makes other feel? It's no badge of honour. It's like declaring you have a self-inflicted critical illness.

To claim to be an atheist and to claim that no God exists is just pure ignorance. As stated earlier you can only make that argument if you are all knowledgable.

Atheism - Strong Atheism
Does "strong" atheism correspond with or contradict objective reality? Let's look at this question objectively. Suppose someone asks you, "Does God exist?" You could answer in one of three ways: "I know for certain that God exists" (assured theism), "I don't know whether or not God exists" (insecure theism, agnosticism, "weak" atheism and/or skepticism), or "I know for certain that God doesn't exist" ("strong" atheism).

To know for certain that God exists, you don't have to know everything but you do have to know something - you must either know God personally or you must be aware of some evidence establishing His existence. To be unsure whether or not God exists, you don't have to know everything. In fact, by your own admission you don't know everything. However, to claim to know for certain that God doesn't exist - to positively assert a universal negative - you would have to know everything. To be absolutely certain that God doesn't exist outside the limits of your knowledge, you would have to possess all knowledge.

Let's make this practical. Do you know everything? Do you know half of everything? Do you know 1% of everything? Let's be incredibly gracious and suppose that you know 1% of everything there is to know. Thomas Edison confidently declared, "We do not know a millionth of one percent about anything." Nevertheless, given the supposition that you know 1% of everything, is it possible that evidence proving God's existence exists in the 99% of everything you don't know? If you're honest, you'll have to admit that it's a real possibility. The fact is, since you don't possess all knowledge, you don't know if such evidence exists or not. Thus, you cannot be a "strong" atheist - you don't know that God doesn't exist

[kandr]

Do you know how sad that makes other feel? It's no badge of honour. It's like declaring you have a self-inflicted critical illness.

Chico??

[MarillionFan]

Chico??

[eyes narrow]

Got any funny pictures of Threaded?