Confrontation in the gym last night!

[MarillionFan]

Please sir, please sir, that boy is saying nasty things in front of the clergy.

[kandr]

Seems very out of character for you Wilmslow. Come on sockie owner keep it consistent, are we to believe he let's someone freely empty their bladder on his shoes without a peep, then this?

[sasguru]

Seems very out of character for you Wilmslow. Come on sockie owner keep it consistent, are we to believe he let's someone freely empty their bladder on his shoes without a peep, then this?

Sorry, its hard to keep track.

[MarillionFan]

Please sir, please sir, that boy is saying nasty things in front of the clergy.

I got an infraction for that! Oh come on. (smiley with gun blowing brains out)

I'm off for the day.

[realityhack]

Is making personal attacks at me based on my faith what passes for wit in your book?

Point 1: I reserve the right to make fun of anyone who has irrational beliefs e.g. having "faith". HTH.

Sas - d000hg has a point. For the benefit of the congregation, please try to restrict such flaming to the thread you created for this purpose - it makes it easier for us to keep track of, or avoid, as we see fit.

[d000hg]

Sas - d000hg has a point. For the benefit of the congregation, please try to restrict such flaming to the thread you created for this purpose - it makes it easier for us to keep track of, or avoid, as we see fit.

You do realise that thread was created as a thinly veiled shot at me personally, in response to my post above?

[SupremeSpod]

You do realise that thread was created as a thinly veiled shot at me personally, in response to my post above?

Live with it.

[d000hg]

You are one of the most troll like posters on here

Do provide evidence to support that. It's not trolling to say what you think, if you read my posts you'll find my opinions are consistent.
It is trolling when you can't even remember what side it is you claim to agree with in a debate.

MF: what did you post that got wiped? PM if you want, I won't cry

[d000hg]

Live with it.

Why should I, it's against board rules.

[realityhack]

You do realise that thread was created as a thinly veiled shot at me personally, in response to my post above?

It could well have been. But it's a standalone debate in itself worth having. Yet again. Albeit, in this case, without actual debating points or properly constructed arguments so far, as kandr pointed out.

Anyway I'd rather have such flaming confined to one thread specifically set aside for it than all over the place disrupting other topics and making it even harder to follow any logic that may make itself manifest to those who choose to put themselves through the ordeal.