- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Check your fingers
Collapse
X
-
-
-
-
The shorter the index finger; the more testerone you have and hence you are a male. If your index finger is longer then you should have been a woman. Most homosexuals have long index fingers.Originally posted by kandr View Post
I have nothing against you being gay."A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
Now we know why MF was trying to shorten his finger. He wanted the health benfits but not the stigma.Originally posted by Paddy View PostThe shorter the index finger; the more testerone you have and hence you are a male. If your index finger is longer then you should have been a woman. Most homosexuals have long index fingers.
I have nothing against you being gay.Comment
-
Originally posted by kandr View PostNow we know why MF was trying to shorten his finger. He wanted the health benfits but not the stigma.
"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
Simple common sense. The longer your index finger, the further you can shove it up your arse in order to spot the early stages of prostate cancer.Comment
-
Well I'm completely f$£@£ thanks guys - what else can cheer me up."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
I'm skeptical whether the researchers aren't confusing a statistical anomaly for a causal link.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
I thought it was something to do with the amount of testosterone you're given in the womb, so I think there is some science behind it. Not sure I agree with Paddy's summation though.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI'm skeptical whether the researchers aren't confusing a statistical anomaly for a causal link.Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Today 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Yesterday 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03
- What the Ray McCann Loan Charge Review means for contractors Jan 14 06:21
- IT contractor demand defied seasonal slump in December 2025 Jan 13 07:10
- Five tax return hacks for contractors as Jan 31st looms Jan 12 07:45
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Jan 9 07:01
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Jan 8 07:26


Comment