McCanns sign Madeleine book deal

[kandr]

Have you used SKA? My site has 1300 backlinks, SKA registers 1.

Useless piece of crap.

Is it real? Whats the url?

[AtW]

I am going to ask you a question and if you refuse to answer well I am going to asume the worst. You have lived in this country for many years but never had an income source... Have you been scrounging of us for 7 years?

The answer is no, I have not claimed any benefits apart from:

1) single occupancy council tax discount (25%) - don't think it's classed as "benefit"
2) student council tax discount (100%) when I was student (long time ago).

If I was one of few people in place where such horrible crime happened (whether it's a murder or kidnepping) then it would be reasonable to expect to be asked bluntly if I had done it - certainly any refusal to answer questions explaining what you did etc would be grounds for pretty damn reasonable suspicion.

[AtW]

In a dodgy situation you are wisest to answer NO questions.

It is very wise if you are guilty.

[AtW]

those questions are not designed to find the girl, they are designed to secure a conviction.

The job of police is two fold:

1) find child (ideally alive and well)
2) find whoever is responsible for the crime (kidnepping or murder)

Police have to do both - finding perpetrator can help a LOT to find the victim as well, consequently it is entirely reasonable for police to ask any questions necessary - it's not like she got waterboarded to sign a confession ffs.

[minestrone]

The answer is no, I have not claimed any benefits apart from:

1) single occupancy council tax discount (25%) - don't think it's classed as "benefit"
2) student council tax discount (100%) when I was student (long time ago).

If I was one of few people in place where such horrible crime happened (whether it's a murder or kidnepping) then it would be reasonable to expect to be asked bluntly if I had done it - certainly any refusal to answer questions explaining what you did etc would be grounds for pretty damn reasonable suspicion.

kidnepping?!?!

If you are going to accuse one of our citizens of a crime can you at least spell it correctly.

[AtW]

we run this country on this forum.

I don't think you run this country ministrone, and that's a good thing.

[AtW]

If you are going to accuse one of our citizens of a crime can you at least spell it correctly.

I am not accusing anybody.

What I said that if:
1) child is alive and returned back then this is kidnapping case (or its lose equivalent)
2) child is not alive and then it's a murder (supercedes kidnapping which also may be the case).

I don't think the child could walk away on her own.

Now who did it is a question, but I think there is no question here that one of those terrible crimes took place, the question is who and in absence of other suspects it is reasonable for police to question McCanns.

[EternalOptimist]

The job of police is two fold:

1) find child (ideally alive and well)
2) find whoever is responsible for the crime (kidnepping or murder)

Police have to do both - finding perpetrator can help a LOT to find the victim as well, consequently it is entirely reasonable for police to ask any questions necessary - it's not like she got waterboarded to sign a confession ffs.

you change your position quicker than a sofa can be investigated.

we are all agreed that the police should ask these questions, and why.

the point here is that the mother refused to answer some of those questions. Some people see that as significant, in terms of guilt. I dont

[minestrone]

I don't think you run this country ministrone, and that's a good thing.

Someone has kidneped your brain.

[AtW]

the point here is that the mother refused to answer some of those questions.

In my opinion she refused to answer very important and very reasonable questions.

Like say whats the problem answering question:

"12- Who contacted the authorities? "

Now I assume that Troll's list of unasnwered questions is correct here.