- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
We're all in this together
Collapse
X
-
-
It's not surprising when corporation tax is so high in this country.
IMHO corp tax should be varied depending on whether particular company provides local employment - there is extra tax gains on that, so it can be entirely justifiable for Vodafone to pay 10% corp tax (but in full without any cheats), on the basis that they provide substantial service and employment in this country. -
Thought this was going to refere to the Vodafone potentially owing India £2.5bn in unpaid taxes story.
Please do the needful and revert.Guy Fawkes - "The last man to enter Parliament with honourable intentions."Comment
-
Vodafone are making 400 people redundant in Banbury.Originally posted by AtW View PostIMHO corp tax should be varied depending on whether particular company provides local employment - there is extra tax gains on that, so it can be entirely justifiable for Vodafone to pay 10% corp tax (but in full without any cheats), on the basis that they provide substantial service and employment in this country.
Why do we have corporation tax? Better to tax shareholders in full on dividends, and not tax companies on profits.Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
Vodafone still employs a lot of people, in my model though such reduction would have resulted in higher corp tax to be paid.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostWhy do we have corporation tax? Better to tax shareholders in full on dividends, and not tax companies on profits.
Trouble with universal zero corp tax is that shareholders might reside outside of country where they pay 0% tax, or just be here but try to do the same (re BN66).
If company provides big employment, big service then in my view it should have smaller corp tax, where as if its a dirty spekulant then corp tax should be highest, and if not registered here for tax purposes then no operation on markets allowed (punishable by SAS in the event of non compliance).Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostIt's not surprising when corporation tax is so high in this country.
IMHO corp tax should be varied depending on whether particular company provides local employment - there is extra tax gains on that, so it can be entirely justifiable for Vodafone to pay 10% corp tax (but in full without any cheats), on the basis that they provide substantial service and employment in this country.
How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.
Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - AesopComment
-
Nice of the telegraph to catch upOriginally posted by Clippy View Post
http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...avoidance.htmlCoffee's for closersComment
-
You mean Guardian.Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
I knew I had read a similar article recently - the PE article was very good.
Kudos for posting it a month ago.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment