• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Pointless inventions

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Mini earphones for personal stereos. They don't make your music listening a private matter, as everyone can hear it; it just means everyone hears an annoying high pitched tch ttcchh ttcchh whizz woo tcchh instead of proper music. Proper old fashioned headphones are better.
    I now see people wandering around the streets wearing these.

    Then again, my woolly hat has an aluminium foil lining, so who am I to judge?

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post

      Oh, and archaeological evidence suggess art existed before commerce.
      Please expand with particular reference to how they know that commerce didn't exist.

      For example did the cave painters source all their material themselves or maybe they gave some excess food/skins for it. Just because it's not documented doesn't mean it didn't exist. I quite dislike suggestions that get turned into truths.
      But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
        Please expand with particular reference to how they know that commerce didn't exist.

        For example did the cave painters source all their material themselves or maybe they gave some excess food/skins for it. Just because it's not documented doesn't mean it didn't exist. I quite dislike suggestions that get turned into truths.
        There is no evidence for commerce in any recognisable form existing at the time of cave paintings; that is not evidence for it not existing, but it would suggest that art can exist without commerce. I'm not turning a suggestion into truth; I simply don't believe that the act of creating an object of beauty or expression is dependent on commerce; it becomes dependent on commerce where materials or skills are required that are not directly at hand and require sourcing.

        Anyway, this is besides the point; my issue is with the idea that buildings should be designed to prevent antisocial activity at the cost of aesthetics; I think it's better to just deal with the antisocials who piss in shop doorways than avoid building recessed doorways.
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          There is no evidence for commerce in any recognisable form existing at the time of cave paintings; that is not evidence for it not existing, but it would suggest that art can exist without commerce. I'm not turning a suggestion into truth; I simply don't believe that the act of creating an object of beauty or expression is dependent on commerce; it becomes dependent on commerce where materials or skills are required that are not directly at hand and require sourcing.

          Anyway, this is besides the point; my issue is with the idea that buildings should be designed to prevent antisocial activity at the cost of aesthetics; I think it's better to just deal with the antisocials who piss in shop doorways than avoid building recessed doorways.
          I object to you trying to turn the suggestion that peeing in a doorway has no aesthetics into a truth. When I was younger, I made it into quite an art form




          (\__/)
          (>'.'<)
          ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post

            Anyway, this is besides the point; my issue is with the idea that buildings should be designed to prevent antisocial activity at the cost of aesthetics; I think it's better to just deal with the antisocials who piss in shop doorways than avoid building recessed doorways.
            Agreed, but the recesses are not there purely for aesthetics but to provide protection for the shop from the elements i.e. rain would get in easy if the doors were not recessed and they are opened a lot. The decoration is secondary.
            But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
              I object to you trying to turn the suggestion that peeing in a doorway has no aesthetics into a truth. When I was younger, I made it into quite an art form




              Ah yes, the old games of 'who can piss highest against the wall' and 'who can write his name on the wall'; easy for someone called Jon , difficult but very impressive for someone called Wijegunawardene (Sri Lankan name).
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
                Agreed, but the recesses are not there purely for aesthetics but to provide protection for the shop from the elements i.e. rain would get in easy if the doors were not recessed and they are opened a lot. The decoration is secondary.
                ok, thats enough about the recession, hows about

                toilet lids. what do they do ?? apart from cause disharmony amongst the sexes



                (\__/)
                (>'.'<)
                ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  Ah yes, the old games of 'who can piss highest against the wall' and 'who can write his name on the wall'; easy for someone called Jon , difficult but very impressive for someone called Wijegunawardene (Sri Lankan name).
                  Yeah, them Sri Lankans have small todgers.
                  Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

                  Comment


                    #19
                    The Tamagotchia. That plastic toy you have to "feed" or it dies. What a load of old bollocks.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
                      The Tamagotchia. That plastic toy you have to "feed" or it dies. What a load of old bollocks.
                      Your cat/dog doesn't really love you. What a load of old bollocks.
                      Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X