• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The trouble with Peter Tatchell

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by moorfield View Post
    I thought the idea wnt that catholics shouldn't be shagging other men / women / animals in the first place so disease should not be spread, and they should only be shagging their husbands / wives for the purposes of procreation. Or have I not understood the catholic take on sex ? (IANAC).
    Nope. Got it in one.
    +50 Xeno Geek Points
    Come back Toolpusher, scotspine, Voodooflux. Pogle
    As for the rest of you - DILLIGAF

    Purveyor of fine quality smut since 2005

    CUK Olympic University Challenge Champions 2010/2012

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
      The UK does not have true Free Speech unlike the US. You only have to look at that Pastor who wanted to burn the Quran. If that was the UK, he would have been arrested.
      We did once.

      Google this: if you want a nig**r for a neighbour vote labour
      Last edited by moorfield; 11 September 2010, 20:46.

      Comment


        #13
        Never too sure about the bloke. I liked the way he defended some couple accused of homophobic hate crime saying they had a right to say what they thought but then on TV progs he has seemed confused and self contradictory. Don't imagine he is a terribly good presenter.

        IF an article in the DT is right the program does sound over the top but then the general conscensus on the net seems to be that the bloke who wrote the article is somewhat unbalanced himself so maybe we should wait and watch it.

        MF, how is a homosexual equivalent to a paedophile exactly?
        bloggoth

        If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
        John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by xoggoth View Post


          MF, how is a homosexual equivalent to a paedophile exactly?
          The normality of sexuality or sexual proclivity seems to be based on a statistical acceptance. Homosexuality is now accepted in Western informed society on the basis of statistical compliance. So heterosexuality is 90% of proclivity. Homosexuality 9%. So now homosexuality is accepted. Other sexual inclination such as paedophilia or necrophillia,copraphillia are unaccepted.

          So whose to say that you shouldn't also film programs with these views represented!!!

          Btw. I only agree with the first 99%.
          What happens in General, stays in General.
          You know what they say about assumptions!

          Comment


            #15
            Your right! It's high time us necrophilic coprophiles had equal acceptance. Not coprophilic necrophiles though, that's disgusting.
            bloggoth

            If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
            John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

            Comment

            Working...
            X