Originally posted by DaveB
View Post
Leaked documents have shown that the NHS has spent a huge £86 million a year on thousands of websites that do exactly diddly-squat and in many cases 404.
Publich Technology reports that the NHS Digital Communications Review shows one third of the NHS's 4,121 websites had notable deficits in standards, and 1,000 were not even accessible anymore.
...
The paper also says those Googling for NHS info are flummoxed, saying the public struggles to locate the NHS online with a simple search. We did a search for the NHS press office - first hit, or if you're Feeling Lucky - while appearing bona fide in Google leads you straight to a 404 which the NHS charmingly says "Whoops!" on. "Whoops!" indeed - we've a feeling surgeons don't get away with Whoopsies so why the bloody hell is the NHS getting away with spending heaps of money on garbage that is useful to no one?
Publich Technology reports that the NHS Digital Communications Review shows one third of the NHS's 4,121 websites had notable deficits in standards, and 1,000 were not even accessible anymore.
...
The paper also says those Googling for NHS info are flummoxed, saying the public struggles to locate the NHS online with a simple search. We did a search for the NHS press office - first hit, or if you're Feeling Lucky - while appearing bona fide in Google leads you straight to a 404 which the NHS charmingly says "Whoops!" on. "Whoops!" indeed - we've a feeling surgeons don't get away with Whoopsies so why the bloody hell is the NHS getting away with spending heaps of money on garbage that is useful to no one?
Comment