• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

How much will you invoice this year?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Is it just me or do those percentages by the results not make sense?

    I can't even read half of them.
    It's you and your antiquated browser! No-one should use anything but the latest version of all software! How can you be expected to be taken seriously. You're all wrong!


    SupremeSpod - In "flaky developer" mode!

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
      It's you and your antiquated browser! No-one should use anything but the latest version of all software! How can you be expected to be taken seriously. You're all wrong!


      SupremeSpod - In "flaky developer" mode!
      Seems OK in IE6:



      and IE7:



      and IE8:



      all at 1024*768.

      NickFitz in "at least I check these things before shooting my mouth off" mode

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
        Seems OK in IE6:



        and IE7:



        and IE8:



        all at 1024*768.

        NickFitz in "at least I check these things before shooting my mouth off" mode
        Works Ok on mine too. I was being ironic.

        However you may want to have a look at how long Usernames are displayed, there appears to be some bleed over.

        Apologies if this issue has been raised before.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
          However you may want to have a look at how long Usernames are displayed, there appears to be some bleed over.

          Apologies if this issue has been raised before.
          In what context specifically? Also, is this an IE thing or does it happen with other browsers?

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
            Works Ok on mine too. I was being ironic.

            However you may want to have a look at how long Usernames are displayed, there appears to be some bleed over.

            Apologies if this issue has been raised before.
            Bloody Hell. This needs marking.

            On this day, the 14th July 2010. Spod apologised.
            What happens in General, stays in General.
            You know what they say about assumptions!

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
              In what context specifically? Also, is this an IE thing or does it happen with other browsers?
              http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...rkshire-4.html

              GeoffreyWhereeverYouMayBe

              Environment

              IE
              Version 8.0.6001.18702
              Build 86001
              Application Path C:\Program Files\Internet Explorer
              Language English (United States)

              Cipher Strength 128-bit
              Content Advisor Disabled
              IEAK Install No

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
                http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...rkshire-4.html

                GeoffreyWhereeverYouMayBe

                Environment

                IE
                Version 8.0.6001.18702
                Build 86001
                Application Path C:\Program Files\Internet Explorer
                Language English (United States)

                Cipher Strength 128-bit
                Content Advisor Disabled
                IEAK Install No
                Interesting case
                • On IE6, it has "geoffreywhereveryoumay" on the first line, with the first three pixels of "b" appearing outside the container, and "ybe" on the next line, repeating the "y"; it also believes that the element's bounding box is 17px wider than it is, which is the correct number of pixels to accommodate the "be", despite the fact that it's put them on the next line (with the phantom "y"), and has increased the height of the box accordingly;

                • On IE7, it's the same as IE6, except it doesn't draw the partial "b" outside the container;

                • On IE8, it simply overflows the container and draws it all on one line - this means the bounding box has the same width as on IE6 and 7, but isn't as tall as it hasn't drawn anything on the next line;

                • On Opera 10.0 for Mac it behaves like IE8;

                • On the latest Chrome for both Mac and Windows, Opera 10.6, Safari 5, and Firefox 3.6, it wraps "ybe" onto the second line and doesn't extend the box out of its container: this is correct behaviour as word-wrap: break-word; has been applied (otherwise it should have overflowed like IE8).


                The word-wrap property with value break-word is part of CSS3; however, it was in fact an IE5.5 invention, IIRC. IE8 changed the property to have a vendor prefix (-ms-word-wrap) when IE8 is in Standards Mode, which is the correct thing for a proprietary implementation of a non-standardised property. This made it compatible with then-current browsers like Firefox 3.0 and Opera 9, but of course MS update things a lot more slowly than every other browser vendor, and won't support the unprefixed version until IE9 comes out, either later this year or early next.

                In the meantime, I can either supply the prefixed version, or let IE8 exhibit the same behaviour as other browsers (except IE6 and 7) did before the property was brought into CSS3. I think the former would be best.

                Either way, it's unfortunate that even when IE6 and 7 were the only browsers in the world that actually supported it, they still didn't manage to do it properly - that duplicate-characters/stretcheing-bounding-box bug really doesn't make them look good

                Comment


                  #28
                  What happens in General, stays in General.
                  You know what they say about assumptions!

                  Comment


                    #29
                    The scenic route is often more interesting
                    +50 Xeno Geek Points
                    Come back Toolpusher, scotspine, Voodooflux. Pogle
                    As for the rest of you - DILLIGAF

                    Purveyor of fine quality smut since 2005

                    CUK Olympic University Challenge Champions 2010/2012

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Zippy View Post
                      The scenic route is often more interesting
                      Unless it's through Geektown.
                      What happens in General, stays in General.
                      You know what they say about assumptions!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X