Originally posted by MarillionFan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
'elf and safety innit
Collapse
X
-
There is perhaps a case for grouping kids into sizes/weights instead of purely agegroups for learning the game. I think they do tha in NZ these days.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Totally agree... our local club (in Ireland) used to mix & match but unfortunatly for competitions and leagues it went off age group.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostThere is perhaps a case for grouping kids into sizes/weights instead of purely agegroups for learning the game. I think they do tha in NZ these days.Bazza gets caught
Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010Comment
-
group kids on ability, not size/weight. That way they are always playing with the bestOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostThere is perhaps a case for grouping kids into sizes/weights instead of purely agegroups for learning the game. I think they do tha in NZ these days.Comment
-
He walked again, he just had to wear this device on his neck that sent electric pulses into his spine every second which made him look like he had a bad tick.Comment
-
Oh no, don't group by ability; that way the crap ones stay crap and the talented ones get no competition. Ability for rugby develops at different ages; some kids appear useless at age 10, then grow a few inches and become good forwards.Originally posted by FiveTimes View Postgroup kids on ability, not size/weight. That way they are always playing with the bestAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
anyway CM, have you guessed how the athletics kid got his black eye?Originally posted by cailin maith View PostTotally agree... our local club (in Ireland) used to mix & match but unfortunatly for competitions and leagues it went off age group.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
The crap ones will become better, then move up and see if they can cut it at a higher level. The talented ones have to work harder to maintain there place. If not then they moved down a level.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostOh no, don't group by ability; that way the crap ones stay crap and the talented ones get no competition. Ability for rugby develops at different ages; some kids appear useless at age 10, then grow a few inches and become good forwards.Comment
-
By laughing at the rugby team?Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Postanyway CM, have you guessed how the athletics kid got his black eye?
Comment
-
Feck - I forgot about the questionOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View Postanyway CM, have you guessed how the athletics kid got his black eye?
Go on, tell me...Bazza gets caught
Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010Comment
-
Originally posted by SupremeSpod View PostBy laughing at the rugby team?
Bazza gets caught
Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."
CUK University Challenge Champions 2010Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Comment