In the UK, don't they have to warn you of cameras? e.g don't mobile cameras have to be on road stretches signed with speed camera warnings?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Caught by Mobile Speed Cameras
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishing -
but that's illegalOriginally posted by DiscoStu View PostPay the fine and pay a skint student to take your points.
HTH
Comment
-
Only if they want to claim back the costs of the scheme - it has zero bearing on the validity of their prosecution of the motoring offence.Originally posted by d000hg View PostIn the UK, don't they have to warn you of cameras? e.g don't mobile cameras have to be on road stretches signed with speed camera warnings?Comment
-
Although most courses are during office hours, so it's billable time, which can mean many times more than the cost of the fine.Originally posted by lje View PostHow much too fast were you going? If it's 10 miles per hour too much (or less) than you may be able to attend a speed awareness course instead of getting points - the course is the same price as the fine.
Still it avoid the points - and I think you don't even get a conviction registered.Comment
-
And they get around it by putting up permanent speed camera signs everywhere, whether there are cameras or not.Originally posted by d000hg View PostIn the UK, don't they have to warn you of cameras? e.g don't mobile cameras have to be on road stretches signed with speed camera warnings?Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
The scheme has been rolled out by more forces and updated so now they offer it for different speed limits. It depends on the Police force where the offence occurred.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostWhen I was caught by one the courses were only available for people breaking 30 limits.Comment
-
Not true. There are evening courses but these are the most popular so book early! (A previous client ran these courses!) It will vary according to the Police force where the alleged incident occurred as not all forces get their courses from one provider.Originally posted by centurian View PostAlthough most courses are during office hours, so it's billable time, which can mean many times more than the cost of the fine.Comment
-
It will vary from force to force. Some county police will offer the course from (10% +1) over up to (10% +4). You are certainly pushing the upper limit though....!!Originally posted by Slumdog View PostI hope this is possible. Was doing 47 in a 40
There are no guidelines or standards. Each force can decide individually what offences will receive a course offer vs what will be fixed penalties and points. There are only requirements on the course content.Comment
-
There are only “guidelines” for speed camera enforcement. The guidelines state that the police should have a sign before the camera (200 meters?) and another on the police vehicle. The camer should not be hidden. In reality, the guidelines are ignored and the police just do what they want. I have seen the police using civil vans, horseboxes and caravans for hiding cameras. I saw two last weeks within a few miles of each other hidden in the trees and bushes.Originally posted by d000hg View PostIn the UK, don't they have to warn you of cameras? e.g don't mobile cameras have to be on road stretches signed with speed camera warnings?"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
Originally posted by Paddy View PostThere are only “guidelines” for speed camera enforcement. The guidelines state that the police should have a sign before the camera (200 meters?) and another on the police vehicle. The camer should not be hidden. In reality, the guidelines are ignored and the police just do what they want. I have seen the police using civil vans, horseboxes and caravans for hiding cameras. I saw two last weeks within a few miles of each other hidden in the trees and bushes.
I have never encountered such stealth camera placings. My Sat Nav warns me of speed camera if I am approaching one.
I have quite often seen a speed camera warning and a big camera by the side of the road, cut my speed down to the limit, but then seen a BMW/Corsa prat just speed past at twice the speed. I always pray that they get hit with a massive fine and a ban.Vote Corbyn ! Save this country !Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41

Comment