Originally posted by original PM
View Post
For example, if you publish a hockey stick, and a scare story, you will get a massive grant, just like now. But then when you go out and 'find' supporting evidence, your grants will be reduced, after all, you have proved your point.
This will lead to a massive reduction in fiddling of data, peer review journals etc and will expose the charlatans for what they are. snake oil salesmen.
The only people who will now support the theory are the few ramaining who dont have a vested interest. i.e. noone
Comment