Originally posted by wurzel
View Post
As adults we have the self awareness and common sense and understanding which leads us to be deemed mentally stable to understand hte law. Hence why people are able to be excused or given leniency in the cases of them being mentally unstable at the time due to complex psychological issues.
Children brought up in bad homes have severely altered psychological states to that of a normal child or adult. Surprisingly, knowing someone who works directly with children deemed the most mentally unstable in the UK, most are actually from dysfunctional homes containing, for example, parents who are GPs. The stories really surprised me, challenging conventional thoughts.
In the case you mention, it is clear that we cannot suddenly force children to grow up quicker than they are mentally, and it is something that we have done in this country for decades, that has meant children are ending up with all sorts of psychological problems. Growing up at their own pace without having to deal with all the adult shíte that they should simply not be exposed to is the ideal.
In this situation the children involved were clearly disturbed, and should be treated as such, with many years of monitoring in the attempt to turn them around. If adults, rehabilitating is more controversial, since we expect - except in cases of mental illness - to be severely punished, but for children rehabilitation and examination of the causes and best way to provide a solution, the required action to see if integrating into society in 10 to 15 years, if at all possible.
Adults and children are not the same, and on a sliding scale, as people approach adulthood, they should be increasingly prepared for all the shíte they will encounter. But expecting a 10 year old to understand and deal with their own psychological mental problems due to their bad (or lack of!) parental upbringing is unfair.
Comment