Originally posted by larson
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Conservative Technology Manifesto
Collapse
X
-
This is the real problem, the Scots are so bl00dy gullible (and I'm a scot!). They just vote labour no matter what. Stupid socialist ideology! -
Did you say Monorail?Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View PostWhat we need is a monorail.Blood in your pooComment
-
Why would IR35 and BN66 feature in a technology manifesto? A manifesto for small business, maybe - but I doubt that, since they don't really have much interest in it.Comment
-
Comment
-
Less people per head vote labour in Scotland than do in England.Originally posted by Jeebo72 View PostThis is the real problem, the Scots are so bl00dy gullible (and I'm a scot!). They just vote labour no matter what. Stupid socialist ideology!Comment
-
I am happy with a political party at least muttering the word "technology" in their manifesto.
What is Labour's manifesto ?
It might go like this ...lots more of Diversity officers, lots more quangoes, lots more benefits to single mums....etc etc...Vote Corbyn ! Save this country !Comment
-
Cameron has announced at least four quangos that I can think of since he announced he would cut the number.Originally posted by fullyautomatix View PostI am happy with a political party at least muttering the word "technology" in their manifesto.
What is Labour's manifesto ?
It might go like this ...lots more of Diversity officers, lots more quangoes, lots more benefits to single mums....etc etc...Comment
-
Comment
-
They aren't going to say to all the :
1. big business donors yes we are going to remove all those cheap outsourcing deals that allow you to freeze pay and cut costs.
2. lefties that all those filthy businessmen making handfuls of cash won't pay "the right amount of tax" whilst the poor unemployable don't know where their next plasma tv is coming from.
3. PAYE brigade that those entrenepeurs can share the rewards with their spouses as well as the risks.
Not exactly vote winners in these areas are they? We are an economic minority.
The real question is would it change under Labour?
I made more under the Tories than Labour as did many other lower / middle class workers. Under New Lie its been rich party donors and the feckless that have been better off, and the figure prove it.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58


Comment