• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The Generic API

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post

    while(true)
    {
    DoPostOnCUK(GetRandomSockie(),”tulip tulip tulip”);
    }

    object F_uckWorking(string command, ...)
    FTFY

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by AtW View Post
      FTFY
      Thanks; always good to have a code review.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        #13
        Would you be talking about the inner platform like the enterprise rules engine would you.

        I am working with one now that was meant to deal with every future bit of technology, really it boils down to a big feckin hashmap wrapped with 200,000 lines of code.

        I though these were all written about 10 years ago when people never knew any better but I was actually working on one last year where the architect explained "yes, it sells train tickets but we really we designed it so it could sell anything at all". I knocked back the extension.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by wurzel View Post
          Oh dear, no wonder I've been going round in circles. I wanted to do a delete operation so naturally passed in "delete". Now I've finally located the relevant page in the documentation I see I should be passing in "delet". It was obviously put together by an illiterate.
          So what you need is to write a wrapper that accepts "delete" and then calls the generic API with "delet". Simples.
          Best Forum Advisor 2014
          Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
          Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

          Comment


            #15
            I worked with a guy designing a corporate database.

            He had a plan that every table would have a many-to-many join table with every other, so the schema looked like a rats nest. He said this "future proofed" the database for any possible business changes.

            Smart cookie.

            Comment


              #16
              I once worked with a piece of software that had two tables.

              items (item_id, item_name)

              attributes(attribute_id, item_id, attribute_name, attribute_value)

              The software in question was an offering from a well known database vendor.
              While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by doodab View Post
                I once worked with a piece of software that had two tables.

                items (item_id, item_name)

                attributes(attribute_id, item_id, attribute_name, attribute_value)

                The software in question was an offering from a well known database vendor.
                You mean an Entity-Attribute-Value database.

                Good theory, awful practise.
                Best Forum Advisor 2014
                Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
                Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
                  Good theory, awful practise.


                  Practice

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by AtW View Post


                    Practice
                    We don't pick you up on your Russian typo's so lay off our English ones.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
                      I worked with a guy designing a corporate database.

                      He had a plan that every table would have a many-to-many join table with every other, so the schema looked like a rats nest. He said this "future proofed" the database for any possible business changes.

                      Smart cookie.

                      Was he from infosys?
                      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X