Originally posted by Mich the Tester
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The Generic API
Collapse
X
-
-
Thanks; always good to have a code review.Originally posted by AtW View PostFTFYAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Would you be talking about the inner platform like the enterprise rules engine would you.
I am working with one now that was meant to deal with every future bit of technology, really it boils down to a big feckin hashmap wrapped with 200,000 lines of code.
I though these were all written about 10 years ago when people never knew any better but I was actually working on one last year where the architect explained "yes, it sells train tickets but we really we designed it so it could sell anything at all". I knocked back the extension.Comment
-
So what you need is to write a wrapper that accepts "delete" and then calls the generic API with "delet". Simples.Originally posted by wurzel View PostOh dear, no wonder I've been going round in circles. I wanted to do a delete operation so naturally passed in "delete". Now I've finally located the relevant page in the documentation I see I should be passing in "delet". It was obviously put together by an illiterate.Comment
-
I worked with a guy designing a corporate database.
He had a plan that every table would have a many-to-many join table with every other, so the schema looked like a rats nest. He said this "future proofed" the database for any possible business changes.
Smart cookie.
Comment
-
I once worked with a piece of software that had two tables.
items (item_id, item_name)
attributes(attribute_id, item_id, attribute_name, attribute_value)
The software in question was an offering from a well known database vendor.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
You mean an Entity-Attribute-Value database.Originally posted by doodab View PostI once worked with a piece of software that had two tables.
items (item_id, item_name)
attributes(attribute_id, item_id, attribute_name, attribute_value)
The software in question was an offering from a well known database vendor.
Good theory, awful practise.Comment
-
Comment
-
We don't pick you up on your Russian typo's so lay off our English ones.Originally posted by AtW View Post
Practice
Comment
-
Was he from infosys?Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostI worked with a guy designing a corporate database.
He had a plan that every table would have a many-to-many join table with every other, so the schema looked like a rats nest. He said this "future proofed" the database for any possible business changes.
Smart cookie.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment