• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Will the Large Hadron Collider destroy the world?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Very niche area that carries fatal risk to the WHOLE PLANET, if not solar system.

    What practical benefits came out from other colliders that were in existance for decades? flip all - Intel did far more for the world then all colliders combined.
    Actually, the technology developed in particle accelerators and colliders has been applied to make radioactive isotopes used in medicine, and is used in scientific imaging such as crystallography and analysis of protein structure.

    In fact I suspect intel would have acheived somewhat less than they have without the insights into solid state physics that synchrotron radiation has provided.
    While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by doodab View Post
      Other than advances in superconducting power transmission technology, magnet technology, techniques for handling and processing massive amount of data and, oh yes, nearly forgot, understanding how the universe works?

      Can't think of anything TBH. ******* waste of money, science.
      OK, so apart from advances in superconducting power transmission technology, magnet technology, techniques for handling and processing massive amount of data and, oh yes, nearly forgot, understanding how the universe works - what have the Romans ever given us?
      Best Forum Advisor 2014
      Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
      Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
        OK, so apart from bla bla bla - what have the Romans ever given us?
        Toga parties
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #24
          the forum?

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by doodab View Post
            Actually, the technology developed in particle accelerators and colliders has been applied to make radioactive isotopes used in medicine
            I don't see commercial companies funding such colliders - that's because return on investment is approximately -1000000%.

            Intel funds its own research - I have not heard of them paying any money to support such massive colliders that try to pursue such dangerous goals as creation of conditions before Big Bang.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by DS23 View Post
              the forum?
              How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

              Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
              Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

              "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by AtW View Post
                I don't see commercial companies funding such colliders - that's because return on investment is approximately -1000000%.
                That was just about the ROI on Brunel’s Great Eastern. Then someone figured out it could be used for laying transatlantic cables.
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  That was just about the ROI on Brunel’s Great Eastern. Then someone figured out it could be used for laying transatlantic cables.
                  This Brunel's Great Eastern carry a risk of having this planet blown up to pieces? I think not.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by AtW View Post
                    This Brunel's Great Eastern carry a risk of having this planet blown up to pieces? I think not.
                    I thought we'd moved on to ROI?
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by DS23 View Post
                      the forum?
                      Best Forum Advisor 2014
                      Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
                      Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X