• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Will the Large Hadron Collider destroy the world?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Given that the whole of the technology that IT and indeed the whole of the economy and current civilisation of the human race is based required the development of quantum theory, it seems odd to question the need of such research.
    How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

    Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
    Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

    "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
      I thought we'd moved on to ROI?
      ROI is secondary - I would not care if collider was wasting money so long as it's not me who is paying for it.

      I object to the grave risks associated with that project. In addition to it ROI is non-existant, no private company funds such projects.

      Comment


        #33
        When men first starting digging big holes to extract coal and other ores from the ground, for all they knew, and according to some mythologies of old, they might have released the spirits of the dead, great fire breathing monsters and giant three headed dogs into the environment, thereby wiping out all of humanity. But that’s not what happened.
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          When men first starting digging big holes to extract coal and other ores from the ground, for all they knew, and according to some mythologies of old, they might have released the spirits of the dead, great fire breathing monsters and giant three headed dogs into the environment, thereby wiping out all of humanity. But that’s not what happened.
          Sensibly, the forward thinking, right minded few realised the chance of releasing fire breathing monsters from a seam of coal was extremely unlikely (cubed).
          ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

          Comment


            #35
            Anyway, why worry if it all goes wrong. There are plenty of other universes where it didn't.
            How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

            Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
            Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

            "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              I don't see commercial companies funding such colliders - that's because return on investment is approximately -1000000%.

              Intel funds its own research - I have not heard of them paying any money to support such massive colliders that try to pursue such dangerous goals as creation of conditions before Big Bang.
              There are no colliders that seek to recreate the conditions before the big bang. You have just started talking rubbish now I'm afraid.

              Synchrotrons have advanced semiconductor physics. Many of the X-ray based techniques used to study semiconductor crystals rely on synchrotrons (i.e. big particle accelerators) to provide the necessary radiation.

              Intel are a semiconductor company. They may not have funded the devices but they have benefited from the advances in physics that occured. They also collaborate with universities on basic research (like most big companies) and I would expect their engineers read academic journals & papers in the field and make use of the results.
              Last edited by doodab; 10 March 2010, 14:11.
              While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

              Comment

              Working...
              X