• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

more LHC woes

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    I’ll take Professor Brian Cox’s word on this one.
    And if he is mistaken then what would you do? Chances are you will only have enough time to say - "ATW was right after all and Professor Brian Cox is a c...[BOOM]"

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by AtW View Post
      And if he is mistaken then what would you do? Chances are you will only have enough time to say - "ATW was right after all and Professor Brian Cox is a c...[BOOM]"
      ahh is this the BOOM our dear leader has been telling us to expect ?
      The proud owner of 125 Xeno Geek Points

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        I’ll take Professor Brian Cox’s word on this one. I don't really lilke the 'appeal to authority' form of argument, but I have a feeling he knows a lot more about the LHC than I do. he is also a world renowned authority on the subject of twats.
        You mean you'd believe an eminent scientist over a forum know-all?
        ǝןqqıʍ

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
          You mean you'd believe an eminent scientist over a forum know-all?
          Eminent scientist can't possibly give 100% guarantee nothing happens - nobody effing knows what will happen, they got theories that they hope to prove and get nobel prize. Very nice of them, but the risks that their research carries might look small but since it's totally unknown AND potentially very seriously dangerous to the whole effing planet, then this research should stop given that it brings no obvious benefits.

          I would not want this thing nearer than 100000 light years from Earth, maybe further.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by AtW View Post

            I would not want this thing nearer than 100000 light years from Earth, maybe further.
            Some people have been known to say that about you.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              Eminent scientist can't possibly give 100% guarantee nothing happens - nobody effing knows what will happen, they got theories that they hope to prove and get nobel prize. Very nice of them, but the risks that their research carries might look small but since it's totally unknown AND potentially very seriously dangerous to the whole effing planet, then this research should stop given that it brings no obvious benefits.

              I would not want this thing nearer than 100000 light years from Earth, maybe further.
              If it means I don't have to read any more of the tulip you post on here then maybe a new big bang wouldn't be such a bad thing
              ǝןqqıʍ

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                Some people have been known to say that about you.
                I don't carry a risk of having solar system turn into one black hole though.

                At least not yet...

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by AtW View Post
                  I don't carry a risk of having solar system turn into one black hole though.
                  Neither does the LHC....

                  Frankly, I think you pose a greater threat to humanity.
                  ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
                    Neither does the LHC....
                    You can't say it for sure - what they are trying to do is unexplored and they in their own words trying to recreate conditions that existed before or around Big Bang - this certainly does not sound like some cuddly fluffy animals.

                    I say give each of those bozos a million dollars to retire and write books how evil Govt did not allow them to conduct their research. Beats turning earth into new Sun or a blackhole

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by AtW View Post
                      You can't say it for sure - what they are trying to do is unexplored and they in their own words trying to recreate conditions that existed before or around Big Bang - this certainly does not sound like some cuddly fluffy animals.

                      I say give each of those bozos a million dollars to retire and write books how evil Govt did not allow them to conduct their research. Beats turning earth into new Sun or a blackhole
                      Funny how someone who makes a living from technology all of a sudden becomes a Luddite.
                      ǝןqqıʍ

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X