Originally posted by Mich the Tester
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
VAT on food
Collapse
X
-
And there's no restriction on movement of goods/purchases between Swiss/EU territory? Or are there import/export limits?"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested." -
What exactly is wrong with this anomoly? Are you saying therefore that there should be only one search engine. Just imagine how simple that would be.Originally posted by AtW View PostSmugglers take chances and won't do it for small %-tage, I'd say risk factors would demand at least 5-10% premium, it's the cross border legit trade that's the issue - high UK taxes on booze/smokes create anomaly of people going to France to buy those items. It's total bollox and can only be solved by having unified tax system.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
It's an anomaly because people should not be going to next country to buy same goods just because of artificially higher taxes in their home country.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostWhat exactly is wrong with this anomoly?Comment
-
Yes they should. That forces their home country to reconsider tax policies. Don't claim that voting would change that; if it ever did it would be abolished.Originally posted by AtW View PostIt's an anomaly because people should not be going to next country to buy same goods just because of artificially higher taxes in their home country.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
why not?Originally posted by AtW View PostIt's an anomaly because people should not be going to next country to buy same goods just because of artificially higher taxes in their home country.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
They do, but the restrictions aren’t all that great and are difficult to police given the sheer amount of traffic crossing Swiss/EU borders every day. Officially you’re limited to how much money you can take to Switzerland and sometimes the German officials will check to see if you’ve stashed a large amount in the car. Officially the Swiss customs check this too, but what do they gain in practice from discouraging people from bringing their cahs to Switzerland?Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostAnd there's no restriction on movement of goods/purchases between Swiss/EU territory? Or are there import/export limits?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Has UK changed its booze duty policies as the result of mass travel to France? I think not - no country would do it so long as they can get away with it.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostThat forces their home country to reconsider tax policies.
That's why taxes should be set centrally in EU so that no Liebor **** could come to power to start taxing and spending.
If Govt wants to spend money it should earn it first through creation of policies that would encourage long term investment and thus natural expansion of GDP rather than one based on debt fueled by tax/spend.Comment
-
Because it makes no economic sense - delivery cost of such common goods in a bulk is much cheaper than having many people travel to buy handful of those goods.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Postwhy not?Comment
-
So what?. If people want to travel 50 million miles to the moon to buy something that they can get from the local corner shop why shouldnt they be allowed to do so?Originally posted by AtW View PostBecause it makes no economic sense - delivery cost of such common goods in a bulk is much cheaper than having many people travel to buy handful of those goods.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
That would be taking the piss.Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostSo what?. If people want to travel 50 million miles to the moon to buy something that they can get from the local corner shop why shouldnt they be allowed to do so?
AtWAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Today 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Yesterday 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03

Comment