I don't like the idea of being authenticated, certainly not against my will.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Authenticated people on CUK
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
I'd agree with AtW (WTF?). I like the anonymity of just being RSoles and feel there's already too much info being given out for no reason or benefit.
Maybe I'm just being paranoid.........Comment
-
Originally posted by RSoles View PostI'd agree with AtW (WTF?). I like the anonymity of just being RSoles and feel there's already too much info being given out for no reason or benefit.
Maybe I'm just being paranoid.........
What is being given out? The original post was meant to show whether a user is a sockie or not.
Of course, it failed with RC being a real person, since he was a sockie but was a person that people met and authenticated
Comment
-
Nothing Mr. AndersonOriginally posted by TheFaQQer View PostWhat is being given out?
Please remain where you for the next 30 minutes.Comment
-
Failed? It accurately shows who authenticated who, so anyone might make their own judgement on authenticators and their authenticators in turn. Wilmslow is up there too, that his authenticators might be judged and duly sentenced.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
What is being given out? The original post was meant to show whether a user is a sockie or not.
Of course, it failed with RC being a real person, since he was a sockie but was a person that people met and authenticated
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Can we have a management summary please of the casesOriginally posted by TimberWolf View PostThat's my case.How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
RC wasn't a sockie, it's just that the real person had several identities, but he actually was them when he was using them. (He also had loads of sockies who were just sockies.)Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
What is being given out? The original post was meant to show whether a user is a sockie or not.
Of course, it failed with RC being a real person, since he was a sockie but was a person that people met and authenticated
Comment
-
Hmm, all referred to in the past tense. RIP.Originally posted by NickFitz View PostRC wasn't a sockie, it's just that the real person had several identities, but he actually was them when he was using them. (He also had loads of sockies who were just sockies.)Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Mileage rates review: Will the first AMAP rethink in 15 years benefit contractors? Today 05:57
- What is a Forward Deployed Engineer (FDE), and are FDE jobs for IT contractors ripe? Yesterday 04:43
- IT contractor demand lunged towards growth in April 2026 May 13 04:48
- What does PGMOL’s win over HMRC mean for contractors? May 12 07:25
- Contractors eyeing mortgages ‘unrealistic about BoE’s 3.75% hold decision’ May 11 07:50
- The fake job problem is getting worse. Are contractors a particularly easy target? May 8 07:49
- Government policy on freelancing is stopping the contractor model from doing its thing May 7 08:12
- Contractors, can the new HMRC loan charge settlement opportunity reduce your bill? May 6 07:51
- Contractors, can the new HMRC loan charge settlement opportunity reduce your bill? May 6 04:51
- PGMOL’s ‘not finely balanced’ win over HMRC could be ‘persuasive’ in IR35 cases May 5 07:10

Comment