I don't like the idea of being authenticated, certainly not against my will.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Authenticated people on CUK
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
I'd agree with AtW (WTF?). I like the anonymity of just being RSoles and feel there's already too much info being given out for no reason or benefit.
Maybe I'm just being paranoid.........Comment
-
Originally posted by RSoles View PostI'd agree with AtW (WTF?). I like the anonymity of just being RSoles and feel there's already too much info being given out for no reason or benefit.
Maybe I'm just being paranoid.........
What is being given out? The original post was meant to show whether a user is a sockie or not.
Of course, it failed with RC being a real person, since he was a sockie but was a person that people met and authenticated
Comment
-
Nothing Mr. AndersonOriginally posted by TheFaQQer View PostWhat is being given out?
Please remain where you for the next 30 minutes.Comment
-
Failed? It accurately shows who authenticated who, so anyone might make their own judgement on authenticators and their authenticators in turn. Wilmslow is up there too, that his authenticators might be judged and duly sentenced.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
What is being given out? The original post was meant to show whether a user is a sockie or not.
Of course, it failed with RC being a real person, since he was a sockie but was a person that people met and authenticated
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Can we have a management summary please of the casesOriginally posted by TimberWolf View PostThat's my case.How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
RC wasn't a sockie, it's just that the real person had several identities, but he actually was them when he was using them. (He also had loads of sockies who were just sockies.)Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
What is being given out? The original post was meant to show whether a user is a sockie or not.
Of course, it failed with RC being a real person, since he was a sockie but was a person that people met and authenticated
Comment
-
Hmm, all referred to in the past tense. RIP.Originally posted by NickFitz View PostRC wasn't a sockie, it's just that the real person had several identities, but he actually was them when he was using them. (He also had loads of sockies who were just sockies.)Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment