Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No entitlement to be here but we still have to pay. Great Plan B possibilities.
Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
"Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECD
The Appeal court in London sent the case straight to Luxembourg instead of ruling on it themselves.
And the ruling is for other EU citizens i.e. those from Poland, Portugal, France not those from countries outside the EU i.e. Somalia, India, Australia. Hence the headlines for the story are wrong.
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR
The Appeal court in London sent the case straight to Luxembourg instead of ruling on it themselves.
And the ruling is for other EU citizens i.e. those from Poland, Portugal, France not those from countries outside the EU i.e. Somalia, India, Australia. Hence the headlines for the story are wrong.
So i guess we send the CSA over to Denmark then?
Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
"Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECD
The Appeal court in London sent the case straight to Luxembourg instead of ruling on it themselves.
And the ruling is for other EU citizens i.e. those from Poland, Portugal, France not those from countries outside the EU i.e. Somalia, India, Australia. Hence the headlines for the story are wrong.
I thought the story was pretty clear.
Woman comes to london to be with husband, who works for 5 months. Stops working, claims incapacity, fcks off to Denmark when it runs out and leaves her here, and you (hehe) the UK taxpayers get to pick up the bill for someone who's not a UK national (Or her kids) and has never in her life contributed a penny to the UK economy.
Now I'm a bit of a lefty (Shock horror), but ffs even I can see that's just not right.
Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith
Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek
That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay
Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - Cyberghoul
Woman comes to london to be with husband, who works for 5 months. Stops working, claims incapacity, fcks off to Denmark when it runs out and leaves her here, and you (hehe) the UK taxpayers get to pick up the bill for someone who's not a UK national (Or her kids) and has never in her life contributed a penny to the UK economy.
Now I'm a bit of a lefty (Shock horror), but ffs even I can see that's just not right.
The headlines wouldn't sound so good if it was Danish Benefit scrounger.
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR
Comment