Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke
View Post
Trying to argue in favour of an ID card because it will reduce terrorism doesn't work - look at Spain.
Unfortunately, the powers that be haven't grasped how they could really be selling the concept of an ID card, e.g.
- If we have an ID card, we can cut £1 billion of benefit fraud. That means we can cut taxes, which makes you better off.
- If you have an ID card - you can earn loyalty points for doing different things. The more you do, the more money you can save - just like a clubcard / nectar card / credit card.
- If you fly, and don't have an ID card, you must turn up three hours before a flight and be anally probed before we let you on a plane. If you have an ID card, you can turn up 20 minutes beforehand and get straight through to the gate.
In 2002, I saw Larry Ellison give a very convincing presentation about what an ID card could actually do - you need to get something that makes people actually WANT one. Once you do that (and one of his examples was the ability to fly easily), people will start using them - and if you have enough incentives to use them, people would be prepared to pay for them.
Given the amount of loyalty cards that people sign up for because they might save 30p on a tin of beans every six months, people will sign up voluntarily for something that tracks their every move, what they spend, how often and where. The difference is that an ID card will hold less information than Tesco does, but people are scared of the idea of having one because the Daily Heil / Sun / Express tells them that they should be.
Edit - I know that none of my points provides a "justification". The scheme doesn't need justification - it needs to be sold to a sceptical public. Sell it correctly, and people will queue up for them.
Comment