But OwlHoot, you miss the point: how many bites of the cherry do the lawyers get by doing things this way? In the past it would have been one, fairly short, case. Now the whole circus gets paid at least three times for the same job!
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Anything but murder
Collapse
X
-
Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog. -
Originally posted by AtWThere is something wrong with this civil crap - you either guilty of criminal offence or you not - this should be done on the basis of "beyond reasonable doubt", however bankrupting someone after he/she was judged not guilty by sueing in civil case that will be judged on "balance of probabilities" is just plain wrong, regardless of technicality or not that was responsible for not guilty verdict.Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
Originally posted by OwlHootI'd agree wholehearedly if the verdict had been "not guilty". But I think the jury found him guilty, and it was only the CPS cock up with some paperwork that allowed him to get off on a technicality.
The bottom line is this - using civil proof of guilt to doubly prosecute those who failed to be proven guilty beyond reasonably doubt under criminal law should be banned in principle.Comment
-
Not a nice man
Have a dig about in the history of this man he isn't eaxctly a saint.Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
-
Originally posted by vetranHave a dig about in the history of this man he isn't eaxctly a saint.
Yes, he is scum and probably did it - but if you start using civil proceeding after criminal cases fail then the system will collapse - balance of probabilities is just way too low standard of proof for serious things like murder.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment