Arrrgh, what have they done!!!???

[TheFaQQer]

Well I meant from Sun's so-called portfolio,

Sun have no portfolio now that they have no company

MySQL won't disappear from Oracle's portfolio, though, any more than InnoDB disappeared.

I still have a copy of Sun Linux 4.0 - why start at 4.0, never even got to 4.1, Sun try and reject a lot....

Because it's psychological - start at a higher number and it looks like you have a robust product that has been around for a while. For the same reason that Oracle DB started at 5 IIRC.

[PAH]

Because it's psychological - start at a higher number and it looks like you have a robust product that has been around for a while. For the same reason that Oracle DB started at 5 IIRC.

That explains the jump from Windows 3.1 to 95.

[ctdctd]

That explains the jump from Windows 3.11 for workgroups to 95.

FTFY

[PAH]

FTFY

We're independent freelancers on here. There's no me in workgroup* so I totally ignore that version.

*The permies can have all the brown nose/bag lunches they want.

[minestrone]

http://www.sun.com - it's all Oracle-y....

And I can't find owt, it's a mess, looks a primitive merge of oracle.com and sun.com......

I was looking through the site today for APIs and hit an error.

http://www.java.com/hc3.asp

Noticed that the java site is an asp site now, jesus wept.

[Platypus]

I do hope Oracle will push Sun's best product lines

least crap

Sun have lost the plot

[AtW]

Sun have lost the plot

Their pricing was a (n expensive) joke for a long time.

But as they said back then - nobody gets fired for buying Oracle and Sun