• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Funds flee Greece as Germany warns of "fatal" eurozone crisis

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    <cough>

    Not to mention Cater Allen.

    Christ, it's getting so all the banking brands are owned by only a handful of companies.

    Makes it harder to ensure your money's safe with that 50k limit per company (not brand). Have they increased it yet?

    I'm wondering if it's safer to invest your spare cash in some sort of metal or substance that isn't currently all that valuable, but will definately become much more sought after in the next 10-20 years. Any ideas?
    Last edited by PAH; 31 January 2010, 12:26.
    Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
    Feist - I Feel It All
    Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by PAH View Post
      Christ, it's getting so all the banking brands are owned by only a handful of companies.

      Makes it harder to ensure you're money's safe with that 50k limit per company (not brand). Have they increased it yet?

      I'm wondering if it's safer to invest your spare cash in some sort of metal or substance that isn't currently all that valuable, but will definately become much more sought after in the next 10-20 years. Any ideas?
      Aye, this isn't the coverage that it properly deserves.

      However, it doesn't apply to me as I am very poor.
      That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
      How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

      Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
      Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

      "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by PAH View Post
        Christ, it's getting so all the banking brands are owned by only a handful of companies.
        Apparently if they have their own banking license then £50k applies to each of them.

        Now the question I'd have whether it is £50k per account or per bank?

        Either way this is academical - they are printing money left right and center, pounds for everyone!

        Just imagine if UK was in euro zone and wasn't able to print euros - that would have terrible consequences: those who gambled on property markets would go bust and houses would become affordable again, we can't have that!

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by AtW View Post
          Apparently if they have their own banking license then £50k applies to each of them.

          Now the question I'd have whether it is £50k per account or per bank?

          Either way this is academical - they are printing money left right and center, pounds for everyone!

          Just imagine if UK was in euro zone and wasn't able to print euros - that would have terrible consequences: those who gambled on property markets would go bust and houses would become affordable again, we can't have that!
          Bit like how the PIIGS doing right now. There was a nice gag in the Telegraph the other day, it described Greece as the ouzozone.

          BTW, I was against printing money and also believe that many assets including housing were over inflated. A deliberate policy of the nuLieBore government.
          How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

          Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
          Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

          "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
            Bit like how the PIIGS doing right now.
            So they are doing it now just like UK does, so this means they did not lose "control" over their currency?

            A deliberate policy of the nuLieBore government.
            To be fair it's not just them - the Fed has been doing it under Bush and continued under Obama. Same happened in Europe.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              So they are doing it now just like UK does, so this means they did not lose "control" over their currency?



              To be fair it's not just them - the Fed has been doing it under Bush and continued under Obama. Same happened in Europe.
              It all started under the Clinton regime with there policy of home ownership for all even if they could not afford it. The UK has a high owner-occupier rate and Brown encouraged, through lax monetary policy, to create high inflation in asset classes to fool the electorate by exploiting the wealth effect.

              It's true that Bush went along with it and it is doubtful if the Conservatives would have done anything different either. Doesn't make it right.
              How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

              Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
              Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

              "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
                It all started under the Clinton regime with there policy of home ownership for all even if they could not afford it.
                What about Thatcher?

                Doesn't make it right.
                No it doesn't, but it makes Nu Liebor no different in this respect - I am sure Convervatives would have done the same (encouraged false growth via debt), the temptation to stay in power for long time would have been impossible to resist for those types.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by AtW View Post
                  Now the question I'd have whether it is £50k per account or per bank?
                  Definately per bank, not per account, so if you have more than 50K, you really should spread it between banks (but make sure that they are not effectively the same institution i.e. Cahoot/Abbey/Sandander).

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Just did a quick google and came up with this list: sminki

                    However, I'm puzzled as it has a couple of entries as having a single licence that I would have thought to be shared. As always, do your own research.
                    How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

                    Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
                    Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

                    "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by AtW View Post
                      I am sure Convervatives would have done the same (encouraged false growth via debt)
                      Agreed - and I think this is the main reason why the tories are struggling to nail this election - because although they blame New Labour for the recession, most believe that the tories wouldn't have done any better.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X