• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Tax law can't cover every possibility

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by PAH View Post
    It's who you know not what you have that defines the rich.
    How I wish you were right.
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by PAH View Post
      It'll never happen. It's all smoke and mirrors to make sure the rich stay rich off the earnings of the poor.

      If you try to be clever and bend the rules like 'they' do, you end up getting stuffed with retrospective legislation!

      It's all so blatantly corrupt it's beyond belief, but they know the sheeple are too busy engrossed with chav celebrities to even take notice. As long as the shops are open and they can get more credit they're content.
      WHS with bells on.
      Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
      threadeds website, and here's my blog.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
        How can the rich stay rich by earning off the poor who earn eff all in the first place?
        They are rich because you are poor.

        Agents, tch!
        Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
        threadeds website, and here's my blog.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
          How can the rich stay rich by earning off the poor who earn eff all in the first place?
          What a stupid question.

          But taking the profit of their hard work and paying them peanuts in return, and then having the government take the rest in tax and spend the tax take buying goods and services from the same said companies.

          Simples.

          Comment

          Working...
          X