EO - your smiley is no longer required - long live the sarcmark.

[Moscow Mule]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology...f-the-sarcmark

[EternalOptimist]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology...f-the-sarcmark

heresy
<splutters incoherently>

actually, if you can work out the purpose of the trademark, you will win a krafts creme egg

[Spacecadet]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology...f-the-sarcmark

I think you just missed the entire purpose of that article

[sweetandsour]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology...f-the-sarcmark

Is it just me or does Tom Meltzer look about 12 years old?

Do they get children to write the Grauniad these days?

[EternalOptimist]

I think you just missed the entire purpose of that article

Its a fair point though, the Americans in particular seem to have a problem with sarcasm and irony. Isn't that why they put NOT at the end of their sarky comments?

[Moscow Mule]

I think you just missed the entire purpose of that article

Maybe...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technolog...irst-week.html

[Drewster]

Its a fair point though, the Americans in particular seem to have a problem with sarcasm and irony. Isn't that why they put NOT at the end of their sarky comments?

I am sure you are right.....

[Drewster]

Why would anyone need one?

If you don't get sarcasm then having it pointed out won't help.....

I am sure SAS will be along soon with his usual intelligent comment

[EternalOptimist]

I am sure you are right.....

hmmmm

[Drewster]

I am sure you are right.....

hmmmm

Why would anyone need one?

If you don't get sarcasm then having it pointed out won't help.....

See even EO gets it!