Originally posted by Churchill
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Tory Marriage Tax stuff
Collapse
X
-
So you get more cash in your pocket when your wife doesn't work. It's not that hard to comprehend is it?"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested." -
Why?Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostSo you get more cash in your pocket when your wife doesn't work. It's not that hard to comprehend is it?Comment
-
Why what?Originally posted by Churchill View PostWhy?"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Why should you be able to claim on his/her tax allowance just because you're married?Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostWhy what?Comment
-
The argument goes that you are promoting a healthy family unit by giving tax incentives.Originally posted by Churchill View PostWhy should you be able to claim on his/her tax allowance just because you're married?
I imagine it would have to be given to civil partnerships to avoid riling the LGBT sisterhood.
I'm not sure it's right, but I wouldn't give it back if it was offered.
Anybody know why it was got rid of in the first place (aside from it being cheaper)?"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Probably cheaper to get rid than fight court cases claiming equal rights for ugly black lesbian one armed whale loving couples...Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostThe argument goes that you are promoting a healthy family unit by giving tax incentives.
I imagine it would have to be given to civil partnerships to avoid riling the LGBT sisterhood.
I'm not sure it's right, but I wouldn't give it back if it was offered.
Anybody know why it was got rid of in the first place (aside from it being cheaper)?Comment
-
-
Pretty sure it was a straight tax rise ( by the Tories ) for married couples with one wage earner.Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostThe argument goes that you are promoting a healthy family unit by giving tax incentives.
I imagine it would have to be given to civil partnerships to avoid riling the LGBT sisterhood.
I'm not sure it's right, but I wouldn't give it back if it was offered.
Anybody know why it was got rid of in the first place (aside from it being cheaper)?Comment
-
To return to the question I asked, all we have seen so far is that married couples and unmarried ones are treated the same, so not all there's apparent contention that married couples pay more seems wrong.Comment
-
Can't say I agree with tax breaks for being married, it will be worth very little in any case as we can't afford anything that would be worthwhile - Brown has bankrupted the nation."The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance." CiceroComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Today 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Yesterday 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45

Comment