The problem with a flat-tax would be the mass unemployment it would create.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Fecking mess
Collapse
X
-
-
Could you explain that one please
Originally posted by ChurchillThe problem with a flat-tax would be the mass unemployment it would create.Why not?Comment
-
even the best flat rate tax systems have got exemptions which make it not a real flat rate tax
Anyway, there are too many vested interests in this country (and in many other countries) that have no interest in a simplified flat rate of tax. The Accountancy profession in the UK is well established, prosperous and influential so rest assured that any move to simplify the tax system will be vigorously resisted.
I am usually against this kind of establishment but on this one, my wallet swings the other way the more complex it is the happier we all are.Chico, what time is it?Comment
-
Originally posted by DundeegeorgeWho would be unemployed? Only the halt and the lame (civil service), so where's the loss?Comment
-
Originally posted by MailmanThis is another perfect example of why a flat rate tax system, of say 20% on earnings over £29k with 0% on everything below that, has to be introduced.
That would make this tax credit system obsolete and would certainly have saved several billion pounds in lost taxes!
Mailman
Many would probably feel that those with large families should be hit less hard, for example. You might not agree; but that's a democratic discussion, not a given just because you don't want to discuss it.
There is much more to taxation than government revenue; and the discussion about whether this should be true or not, is itself a discussion within politics (i.e. we may disagree but it is a question of democratic choice), not a discussion about logic (where one of us is correct and the other in error).Comment
-
Actually under my system the people who will gain the most are those who are already earning the least. They will not be burdened by the tax system until they start earning over £29k.
Families are the big winners here, especially those who have suffered under the current tax credit system when they have received payments they should not have and have then been hounded by the IR for the money back.
Accept it, I am right and everyone else is wrong
MailmanComment
-
But the problem with your scheme Mailman is that it simply wouldn't collect enough tax.
You'd be collecting about 20% of the amount that is currently collected and even with the savings that you make in collecting you'd still be 75% down. The maths doesn't come close to working out.
timComment
-
Only problem is...there is still an incentive to avoid paying tax under your suggestion.
Whereas, having ONE tax band makes the system a hell of a lot simpler and more importantly means there is no benefit gained from trying to avoid paying tax because the tax band starts so high.
More importantly your tax credit system is still over engineered and there will have to be an entire army of mandarins (or maybe oranges?) to administer it.
You see under my system there is no point in syphoning payments from your company to you through dividends because the tax on dividends will be 20% (but this wont kick in until your TOTAL income from ALL sources exceeds £29k) etc.
What you have in essence pushed is nothing more than the tax system we have at the moment. My system is fairer on everyone and more importantly treats everyone fairly
The only extra bureacracy in mine is administering payments to people who don't work and don't claim benefits. On the other hand, in yours everyone earning to little to pay tax would have to make an effort (possibly fill in a tax return) to claim back tax on income other than from their main job. Almost everyone in the country would be affected if the zero percent band was big as you suggested. In my system only maybe (wild guess) one hundredth as many people would have to take any action to get their tax bill right. My system is not only less work for taxpayer and IR than yours, it will also save paperwork in the benefits system as households whose tax credits collectively add up to more than their benefits will receive no benefits and only claim the easier to adminster credits instead.
To put it another way, my system is identical to yours except that in mine people receive the cash equivalent of tax relief on the zero percent band regardless of whether or not they have enough taxable income. (A different rate for the flat tax and a different size for the zero-percent band isn't a systemic difference.)Last edited by IR35 Avoider; 14 December 2005, 12:30.Comment
-
Zg
Originally posted by zeitghostMy tax system is the best.
I take all of your money & keep it in a big cardboard box under the bed.
Works for me...
You forgot to sign it 'Gordon Brown'.
What? It's not all under his bed? Well, where the **** has it all gone?Why not?Comment
-
Originally posted by tim123But the problem with your scheme Mailman is that it simply wouldn't collect enough tax.
You'd be collecting about 20% of the amount that is currently collected and even with the savings that you make in collecting you'd still be 75% down. The maths doesn't come close to working out.
tim
MailmanComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment