Millwall football "fans" have caused about £10k damage to buses taking them from the Station to the ground. Who pays for this damage?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
CCTV Cities on Fiver
Collapse
X
-
-
Insurance companies in the first place.Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostWho pays for this damage?
After that clients of insurance companies pick up the bill.
HTH -
Public transport buses do not have to be insuredOriginally posted by AtW View PostInsurance companies in the first place.
After that clients of insurance companies pick up the bill.
HTH
London Trasport do not insure their buses not even for third party."A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
And you think London Transport does not have insurance of some kind to cover for it?Originally posted by Paddy View PostPublic transport buses do not have to be insured
London Trasport do not insure their buses not even for third party.Comment
-
Large companies and government departments do not need insurance. The are allowed to "self insure" instead because they can afford to meet any likely claims from their normal budgets.Originally posted by AtW View PostAnd you think London Transport does not have insurance of some kind to cover for it?
So in the case of a bus company, it is the regular passengers who pay for the vandalism in their ticket price.My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.Comment
-
TfL Probably don't need it. They can cover it with the extra they're screwing out of us commuters with increased fares.......Originally posted by AtW View PostAnd you think London Transport does not have insurance of some kind to cover for it?
Comment
-
Then they are the insurance company that insured all such claims!Originally posted by RichardCranium View PostThe are allowed to "self insure"
And my second assertion - "After that clients of insurance companies pick up the bill." also stands: the "clients" in this case would be the users who use public transport as well as general taxpayers...Comment
-
Is that all?Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostMillwall football "fans" have caused about £10k damage to buses taking them from the Station to the ground.
They must be going soft.
£10k's worth of repairs doesn't cover a lot of damage.
Meanwhile, (but bearing in mind I haven't seen the programme you are referring to) how much do you think the TV production company paid the council / bus company for the rights to use the CCTV footage for which nobody had sought the permission of the people being filmed?
They say the CCVT is there for our safety. Bollocks it is when they sell the footage to the TV companies.My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Today 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17

Comment