• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

2 year rule

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    sorry mate

    pecker up

    how's it going ?

    Milan.

    Comment


      #12
      Same client, same site, no breaks.

      Otherwise, you're fine - especially with other clients in between.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by simes
        Same client, same site, no breaks.

        Otherwise, you're fine - especially with other clients in between.
        Err, not true (wish it were). There's a bunch of guidance about it on t'internet here.

        http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/eimanual/EIM32075.htm

        what counts is location, not client, and the test is generally spending 40% or more of your time at the location over a 24 month period. The IR thinks that a 6 month break is the minimum allowable (I think that's too long, but who am I to blow against the wind?)
        Plan A is located just about here.
        If that doesn't work, then there's always plan B

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by simes
          Same client, same site, no breaks.

          Otherwise, you're fine - especially with other clients in between.
          Not true. A workplace can considered to be permanent (and thus the expenses are not claimable) even if there are breaks in between:

          http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/eimanual/EIM32105.htm

          There is a formula for how long a break needs to be to stop the workplace being the permanent one, but I can't find that information.

          tim

          Comment


            #15
            Very interesting info, but luckily doesn't effect me because I've worked at many different sites including working from home 60/70% of the time. My initial worry that it was nothing to do with sites and location, just if it was the same client. Good.

            Comment


              #16
              An interesting, if somewhat worrying topic.
              I'd always interpreted the rule as 'the point at which you have spent (or know you are going to spend) 24 months at a certain location'.

              Now I'm wondering if it should be 'the point at which you have spent (or know you are going to spend) over 40% of 24 months at a certain location'.

              That's only 9 1/2 months.


              Oh Dear.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by RSoles
                An interesting, if somewhat worrying topic.
                I'd always interpreted the rule as 'the point at which you have spent (or know you are going to spend) 24 months at a certain location'.

                Now I'm wondering if it should be 'the point at which you have spent (or know you are going to spend) over 40% of 24 months at a certain location'.

                That's only 9 1/2 months.


                Oh Dear.
                nah, not to worry. The rule is "over a 24 month period, did you spend 40% or more of your time in the same location?"

                it's the elapsed time that counts
                Plan A is located just about here.
                If that doesn't work, then there's always plan B

                Comment

                Working...
                X