• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Review of 2012

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    An airing on December 21st would be good for ratings. What's the betting they will. Or would that be in bad taste?
    I reckon they should schedule the LHC to come online again 21/12/2012, just for a laugh.
    Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

    Comment


      #12
      Amazingly detailed special effects, pseudo philosophy references, cheesy morality tales, lots of different story threads that dove tail nicely at the end, great performances by Woody Harrelson, John Cusack and Danny Glover and Chiwetel Ejiofor (Britain's black Robert De Niro).

      yes though, it goes into cheesy family values and the preservation of our humanity Vs our self interests but don't let that put you off.

      Its damned good fun, get out of the stormy weather, switch your brain off and go see.

      Comment


        #13
        Is John Cusack getting desperate for cash?

        I really thought this wasn't his bag

        Like Eimmerich's films, this doesn't appeal.
        "Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what's for lunch." - Orson Welles

        Norrahe's blog

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
          Maybe it won, and we're all stuck in some kind of "matrix" and it's all pretend....
          I think everything we know is in fact a simulation in a worst case scenario analysis. Lets face it, in the real world would we ever have a weirdo like the evil snot goblin as PM?
          How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

          Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
          Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

          "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Zippy View Post
            Maybe you are not. It could be learning and plotting ...
            and trying, hitherto unsuccessfully, to get the hang of politics and economics by manipulating a horde of rewired droids called Labour MPs.
            Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

            Comment

            Working...
            X