• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BNP Demos - Why ? FFS

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    UAF national organiser Martin Smith, 43, who spoke to James Robinson outside the centre at 3.36pm today, was seen being led away by police earlier.
    It is not known if he is one of the three people arrested.
    His colleague, Mark Weyman Bennett, told James:
    "Martin was being exuberant, but then exuberance is allowed in a democratic society."
    But free speech ain't?
    Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by kaiser78 View Post
      I, like the majority of the population, are totally dead against the BNP and everything they stand for.

      As I am also against all those do-gooders who will turn up at any sniff of a demo, as they have done tonight outside the Beeb, the bulk probably just for the sake of a good riot with police. Go and do something useful with your lives.

      Crazy society we live in
      The point I am making is not so miuch about the BNP but the do-gooders who at any sign of a protest or a demo (ie clash with the police) will turn up for the sake of it, in my opinion, be it BBC, G8, anti-war. It makes no difference each time anyway and I feel they are turning up just for the confrontation, which is so wrong. I have no time or sympathy for these idiots.
      ______________________
      Don't get mad...get even...

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Zippy View Post
        I didn't see violence (apart from a bit of pushing and shoving). Watched the coverage for about 90 mins or so.
        If it had got violent there is a police horse unit about 10 mins away (Hammersmith) but they didn't show up.
        "Pushing an shoving"? The Police had their batons drawn and riot police were also called in.

        Unacceptable behaviour in a so-called civilised society.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
          WHS^

          When an audience member on QT asks why we still have people pouring into the country whilst we have rising unemployment no-one even attempted to answer? DD moved straight on??

          That's why the BNP has gained support, politicians keep dodging the bloody issue.
          Do we have any evidence of people "pouring into the country"?
          I always suspect emotive "Daily Mail" phrases of that ilk, that are usually spouted by the ill-educated, with no evidence.
          Hard Brexit now!
          #prayfornodeal

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by sasguru View Post
            Do we have any evidence of people "pouring into the country"?
            I always suspect emotive "Daily Mail" phrases of that ilk, that are usually spouted by the ill-educated, with no evidence.
            The fact is UK alone can not control immigration any more..! There can not & will not be any restrictions on free movement of people in EU, once Turkey is there at least for short period there will be large people movement with UK as main target, but it will stabilize later as happened in last EU expansion..

            So Immigration control now means restricting people from US, Asia, China, Auz & Africa. I think we are only worried about immigration from these countries .?? (Hope not...!!)

            If you go and mess with other countries (Afghanistan, Iraq, F Yugoslavia) naturally have to allow people from there countries, at least all spies & double agents (who helped army there) in those countries will have to be accommodated. As they cannot live in their countries any more..!!

            Comment


              #26
              the kaiser was always against british nationalism so no surprise there then

              Comment


                #27
                i think one of the big problems is that people are coming in on vistors visas and not returning or starting a claim for asylum and and pretend they came from some war torn republic where they chop your hand off for stealing or commiting adultery

                anyway the answer is £7000 visitors visa fee if they come from a suspect country and they can pick up £2k on the way back out.

                should solve some of the problem

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
                  WHS^

                  When an audience member on QT asks why we still have people pouring into the country whilst we have rising unemployment no-one even attempted to answer? DD moved straight on??

                  That's why the BNP has gained support, politicians keep dodging the bloody issue.
                  Did you also notice that those asking their agressive and "spontaneous" questions were in the front couple of rows, while those asking the contentious ones were up at the back?

                  All in all a disgraceful stage-managed charade.
                  The vegetarian option.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    I've just been leafing through The Times. Lead Sports Columnist Simon Barnes's response to the program was to list 10 non-white sportspeople who have done Britain proud.

                    WHOOOSH!

                    The BNP are a protest party. Look at their voters' concerns or, if the next BNP leadership is more mainstream media savvy than the current bunch, they could go from strength to strength.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Telegraph: Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser

                      The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

                      He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration" but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its "core working class vote".

                      As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.
                      Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the Migrationwatch think tank, said: "Now at least the truth is out, and it's dynamite.

                      "Many have long suspected that mass immigration under Labour was not just a cock up but also a conspiracy. They were right.

                      "This Government has admitted three million immigrants for cynical political reasons concealed by dodgy economic camouflage."
                      How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

                      Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
                      Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

                      "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X