Originally posted by Bunk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Anyone watch the Derren Brown Casino Event?
Collapse
X
-
-
Yes, no more than he can really predict the winning lottery numbers. But the question is why this one failed.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostThere's no way he would be allowed to win and take the money. Do you guys really think he can predict where the ball is going to land? Duh <pulls best gurning face>
What does everyone make of his apparent super-hypnosis powers to get the £5k? Am I right that just because Channel4 put up a "no stooges were used in this show" that doesn't have to be true and can be part of the show?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
I didn't see it, but I imagine the casino were in on it and he was never going to win, only get close.Originally posted by d000hg View PostYes, no more than he can really predict the winning lottery numbers. But the question is why this one failed.
What does everyone make of his apparent super-hypnosis powers to get the £5k? Am I right that just because Channel4 put up a "no stooges were used in this show" that doesn't have to be true and can be part of the show?Comment
-
It was a fiction, they all are. Would you be talking about it less if it landed on the number he predicted? That's why it didn't.Comment
-
Then why did he get ALL numbers on the lottery, instead of a more believable 5? I was expecting the casino show to end not only with him getting the right number, but revealing he'd tattooed the correct number on the other guys chest weeks ago.Originally posted by shoes View PostIt was a fiction, they all are. Would you be talking about it less if it landed on the number he predicted? That's why it didn't.
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Anyone who thinks it was live shoud look at a replay.
As he walks up to the table, the croupier clearly says 16. But if you look closely at the next shot, the ball has landed on 13.
End If.Comment
-
AFAIK You can't hypnotise someone who is not willing to be hypnotisedOriginally posted by d000hg View PostWhat does everyone make of his apparent super-hypnosis powers to get the £5k? Am I right that just because Channel4 put up a "no stooges were used in this show" that doesn't have to be true and can be part of the show?
also you can't force anyone to give you 5 grands even if he is hypnotised
its all stagedComment
-
But if you were allowed a computer it is possible to predict it : or at least get very close.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostThere's no way he would be allowed to win and take the money. Do you guys really think he can predict where the ball is going to land? Duh <pulls best gurning face>
Which was what Darren did.Comment
-
Even with a computer the odds are small you'd get close on one particular run. Computers just help swing he odds in a statistical way, and no improvement in technology is going to consistently get you close, as tiny changes in initial conditions radically alters where the ball ends up. The probability of Brown doing in his head are effectively zero. It was just a trick.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostBut if you were allowed a computer it is possible to predict it : or at least get very close.
Which was what Darren did.Comment
-
I believe that using a computer allows the ball drop to be predicted to a segment of the wheel.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostEven with a computer the odds are small you'd get close on one particular run. Computers just help swing he odds in a statistical way, and no improvement in technology is going to consistently get you close, as tiny changes in initial conditions radically alters where the ball ends up. The probability of Brown doing in his head are effectively zero. It was just a trick.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How to run a limited company — efficiently: smarter profit strategies Today 07:13
- IR35 & Mutuality of Obligation in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Yesterday 07:32
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Feb 25 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 24 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21
- IR35 & Control in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 20 07:13
- How key for IR35 will Control be in 2026/27? Feb 20 07:13
- Changes to non-compete clauses in employment contracts require ministers to tread carefully Feb 19 07:59
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Feb 19 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Feb 18 07:26

Comment