• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Has this turned into a DIY forum?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Great argument. The point is you still have to draw a line between freedom to express yourself, and stopping people's expression affecting the lives of those around them. You talk about reasoned debates... but that's imposing rules for freedom.
    And by your own logic, was Cyberman ever guilty of "expressing a view in a reasoned debate" when he said Indians are dirty, Scots are stupid, etc?
    The line is there already (it moves of course). As soon as an 'authority' decides they don't like what you are saying your 'right' - or more accurately, means - to say it is removed
    +50 Xeno Geek Points
    Come back Toolpusher, scotspine, Voodooflux. Pogle
    As for the rest of you - DILLIGAF

    Purveyor of fine quality smut since 2005

    CUK Olympic University Challenge Champions 2010/2012

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by d000hg View Post
      Great argument. The point is you still have to draw a line between freedom to express yourself, and stopping people's expression affecting the lives of those around them.
      I agree. I gave some examples, above, that permit freedom of expression without harming others.

      Originally posted by d000hg View Post
      You talk about reasoned debates... but that's imposing rules for freedom.
      And? What's wrong with that?

      Originally posted by d000hg View Post
      And by your own logic, was Cyberman ever guilty of "expressing a view in a reasoned debate" when he said Indians are dirty, Scots are stupid, etc?
      Usually, yes. He expressed a view in a public place and had to tolerate the disagreeing responses of others. He would sometimes then try to counter those responses. (Usually, poorly.)
      My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

      Comment


        #23
        dooohg posted : But regardless of that, you'd defend my right to say anything I might choose about black people? It would be ok in your eyes for me to stand on my box in Hyde Park and talk about how Hitler had the right idea about the Jews?
        Theoretically, you have the personal right to say anything you like about anything you like.

        Whether I agree with you or not is none of my business. If it's a subject I agree with, I might voice my assent. On the other hand, I might not. If it's a subject I strongly disagree with, I might voice my dissent. Then again, I might not.

        The day in which we silence other people, for saying things we disagree with, is the day Tyranny triumphs.

        Hence why I believe you have should have a platform in Hyde Park to say whatever you like. Whether I agree, disagree, or more likely slip off to the pub, is not relevant.
        Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

        C.S. Lewis

        Comment

        Working...
        X