• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Russian plans to invade Manchester

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Anyone who doesnt think Russia has it's own Chav problem has never played an online game

    I'd still have put money on Russia to beat the Mancs though - at the end of the day, we all know who'd be taking knives to a gunfight.
    Oh, I’m sorry….I seem to be lost. I was looking for the sane side of town. I’d ask you for directions, but I have a feeling you’ve never been there and I’d be wasting my time.

    Comment


      #12
      Communism was invented in Manchester, so only fair to let them have a go at it first-hand.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
        You think that's worrying, Berwick-upon-Tweed is still at war with Russia.
        Sorry DP, no it ain't.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Churchill View Post
          Sorry DP, no it ain't.
          He's referring to the Treaty of Paris, but they never started the war either.
          The close proximity of the letters 'G' and 'T' are the reason I'll never again send an important email and end it with "Regards" ....

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by TriggerHippy View Post
            He's referring to the Treaty of Paris, but they never started the war either.
            Oh really...

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
              You think that's worrying, Berwick-upon-Tweed is still at war with Russia.
              The russians signed a 'Peace treaty' with Berwick on Tweed in 1954, 200 years after the Crimean war started.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Toastiness View Post
                The russians signed a 'Peace treaty' with Berwick on Tweed in 1954, 200 years after the Crimean war started.
                Where's the evidence?

                A treaty wasn't needed.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by GreenerGrass View Post
                  I was a child of the bomb, which is why I was surprised they'd bother to physically invade Manchester when they could have just nuked us.
                  We were probably subject to a lot more propaganda than we thought at the time.

                  Originally posted by GreenerGrass View Post
                  It would take a lot of manpower to spread the revolution that far and maintain it's iron grip. Resources wise maybe they wanted coal, North Sea oil and factories.
                  In 1974 we still had factories, and the M62 to Yorkshire was in place. Steel, iron, coal, textiles, engineering, chemicals etc. were all there.

                  Originally posted by GreenerGrass View Post
                  They would have probably installed Labour useful idiots as a puppet government.
                  There were rumours about Harold Wilson, and some of those trade union leaders were definitely that way inclined.

                  Originally posted by GreenerGrass View Post
                  Mind you it was always NATO who would have used tactical nukes first, the Russkis would never have made it into France.
                  That reminds me of the Spitting Image sketch with Ronald Reagan and Nancy in bed. At the time I feared that the Yanks would be first to push the button.
                  Last edited by Sysman; 27 August 2009, 11:05.
                  Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by GreenerGrass View Post
                    The logistics in launching an invasion of the UK would render it impossible for the USSR to do so without a nuclear attack. After such an attack the maps would be useless.

                    A far more believable explanation came from a former Soviet spy who lived in Blackpool. He said that he was so bored with nothing to spy on so he decide to copy maps, he even went to the extent of thinking up new names for the streets
                    "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Paddy View Post
                      The logistics in launching an invasion of the UK would render it impossible for the USSR to do so without a nuclear attack. After such an attack the maps would be useless.
                      I don't buy that. Once they'd established control of mainland Europe you could achieve air superiority over the UK in a couple of weeks. Once you've got that, a successful invasion is pretty much assured.
                      ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X