• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

tories 20% VAT plan.

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by tim123 View Post
    Did he?

    I am sure that I saw their spokesman on TV saying that paying credits to people on 60K was absurd (and they'd be right!)

    tim
    What's the point of paying low earners tax credits - just don't take the tax off them in the first place...

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by centurian View Post
      What's the point of paying low earners tax credits - just don't take the tax off them in the first place...
      Perfectly sensible, how would you do that? Higher tax allowances for instance? It would certainly be a lot cheaper to administer than the tax credit system....

      The drawback with higher tax allowances is that they apply to all earners (unless you set up a bureaucratic method to change the allowances depending on what people earn) which would be a tax cut for everyone.

      I'm not defending the tax credit system, but it does keep the tax take up and saves some when people entitled don't actually claim because it's such a nightmare.

      Comment


        #13
        Redwood argues otherwise.

        Comment


          #14
          Makes sense

          Up VAT catch all the tax evaders. Up bottom tax limit rather than reducing headline rates.

          cut costs.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
            Perfectly sensible, how would you do that? Higher tax allowances for instance? It would certainly be a lot cheaper to administer than the tax credit system....

            The drawback with higher tax allowances is that they apply to all earners (unless you set up a bureaucratic method to change the allowances depending on what people earn) which would be a tax cut for everyone.

            I'm not defending the tax credit system, but it does keep the tax take up and saves some when people entitled don't actually claim because it's such a nightmare.
            Which is exactly what the government is doing next year. As people earn more than 100K, they begin to lose their personal allowance. In fact if you earn between 100-112K, you are effectively paying 61% tax on that 12K slice.

            It would have been far simpler to just start the new 45% band (as it was at the time) at 100K instead of 150k. It brings in roughly the same amount of money - but then the personal allowance method was much stealthier, so are we surprised.

            Even without this, you can juggle around the bands. Increase personal allowance to 10K, but increase basic tax rate to say 22% - maybe re-introduce the 10p rate to soften the blow for those on the edge.

            But this would mean "raising the basic rate of tax" - even though few (if any) people would actually be paying more.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by centurian View Post
              What's the point of paying low earners tax credits - just don't take the tax off them in the first place...
              I think that comment shows you may have little idea of how some people have to cope. Take for example a couple without work (more common than you may think) and one of them is offered part-time work paying £100 a week (thus not paying tax). Without tax credits they would not bother, as they'd lose their benefits. However tax credits would give them an extra £200 a month - still not a fortune, but would allow them to get back into the jobs market. As I mentioned before the Tories have stated they're not going to get rid of tax credits, but will look at the excessive cases where say a couple are earning 40k+ and still able to claim tax credits. I assume that in these cases a lot of children are involved.
              Speaking gibberish on internet talkboards since last Michaelmas. Plus here on Twitter

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by vetran View Post
                Up VAT catch all the tax evaders. Up bottom tax limit rather than reducing headline rates.

                cut costs.
                +1
                There's a lot to be said for straight forward rules that are easy to implement and hard to avoid
                Speaking gibberish on internet talkboards since last Michaelmas. Plus here on Twitter

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by MrMark View Post
                  I think that comment shows you may have little idea of how some people have to cope. Take for example a couple without work (more common than you may think) and one of them is offered part-time work paying £100 a week (thus not paying tax). Without tax credits they would not bother, as they'd lose their benefits. However tax credits would give them an extra £200 a month - still not a fortune, but would allow them to get back into the jobs market. As I mentioned before the Tories have stated they're not going to get rid of tax credits, but will look at the excessive cases where say a couple are earning 40k+ and still able to claim tax credits. I assume that in these cases a lot of children are involved.
                  That's because tax credits has also inherited what is effectively a benefits component. How can you be "credited" for tax when you haven't paid any (income tax anyway)

                  It should be possible to extract the benefits element of tax credits and pay it for what it is - a benefit. Then take the "credit" element out by not taxing low earners to begin with.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Just update the budget from 1996 allowing for inflation. Sack anyone in the public sector that was recruted since 1997.

                    Sorted - simples.
                    How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

                    Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
                    Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

                    "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

                    Comment


                      #20
                      20% VAT and road tolls, not really vote winners
                      The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

                      But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X