• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Terrorists again!!!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    1441 on its own was sufficient.

    Really ?

    Then best tell Mr Annan who deemd the Iraq War illegal.

    Since you are such a stickler for UN resolutions, what about the dozens which Israel has violated with impunity with the backing of the US veto ?

    And let us not forget back in 1980 when Iraq, with the backing of the USA and Saudia Arabia,armed and fiananced Saddam, the former CIA agent, the USA vetoed a Security Council resolution to stop the Iraq Iran War.

    Despicable hypocricy, what old bean ?
    Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 8 November 2005, 15:47.

    Comment


      #62
      I think the bot that is Chico has gone to update its vocabulary. There was an infinite loop that caused the phrases "tree-huggers" and variations of "logical" to be used ad nauseum without making any sense.
      My compliments to the creators though. A lot better than ELIZA.
      Hard Brexit now!
      #prayfornodeal

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by sasguru
        I think the bot that is Chico has gone to update its vocabulary. There was an infinite loop that caused the phrases "tree-huggers" and variations of "logical" to be used ad nauseum without making any sense.
        My compliments to the creators though. A lot better than ELIZA.
        Aye SG

        What will they think of next ?

        Mind you is all good fun as it brightens up an otherwise dull day in the office.

        What a lovely afternoon !

        Why Why Why Eliza ???
        So before they come to break down on the door
        Forgive me Eliza I just couldnt take anymore ...


        Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 8 November 2005, 15:57.

        Comment


          #64
          Is this the same Kofi Annan whose son has been implicated in oil for food scandal? The same Kofi Annan who presided over the most corrupt UN ever or the same Kofi Annan who attempted a cover up once the corruption was exposed? Talk about hypocrisy. Kofi Annan has no credibility whatsoever .
          Sola gratia

          Sola fide

          Soli Deo gloria

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by Chico
            Is this the same Kofi Annan whose son has been implicated in oil for food scandal? The same Kofi Annan who presided over the most corrupt UN ever or the same Kofi Annan who attempted a cover up once the corruption was exposed? Talk about hypocrisy. Kofi Annan has no credibility whatsoever .
            Bloody hell it worked. Vocabulary much updated. Note, however, that just like ELIZA, it repeats words that you have used before. Debating style still a little childlike and repetitious. Still, better than anything the Japanese can come up with.

            Now if only they could fix its logic and inability to answer questions or stick to the point.
            Hard Brexit now!
            #prayfornodeal

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by Chico
              Is this the same Kofi Annan whose son has been implicated in oil for food scandal? The same Kofi Annan who presided over the most corrupt UN ever or the same Kofi Annan who attempted a cover up once the corruption was exposed? Talk about hypocrisy. Kofi Annan has no credibility whatsoever .
              Ah and the dozens of US compaines who also had their noses in the Oil for food trough.

              Yet you were the one who made the UN a body of authority by qouting resolutions, and now you condemn them.

              Odd.

              I think some logic gate needs a tweaking perhaps ?

              Anyway a simple question then ...

              By the standards of International Law, was the Iraq invasion legal or illegal ?
              Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 8 November 2005, 16:01.

              Comment


                #67
                By the same standard was the war in Kosovo legal?
                Sola gratia

                Sola fide

                Soli Deo gloria

                Comment


                  #68
                  Tell you what please answer my question first as we are in fact discussing the Iraq War, not the Kosovo, Vietnam nor the Boer war for that matter.

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by Chico
                    By the same standard was the war in Kosovo legal?
                    Hold on a second Chico it was only a few minutes ago that you sited:
                    "Compliance with UN security council resolutions. Easy really."
                    As a justification for the war in Iraq. Now you appear to be suggesting that the UN can be bypassed as was the case in Kosovo. You can't have it both ways. If the UN resolutions need to be enfoced by military action in the case of Iraq then why not in the case of Israel too?

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Don't hold your breath. Major problem with logic gates. Unfortunately the Chico bot is made of wetware and in spite of millions of years of development, it seems the raw material was poor.
                      Hard Brexit now!
                      #prayfornodeal

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X